My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
09/09/2013 <br /> Impact: Impact 15-1: Geotechnical Hazards Associated with Project Excavation and <br /> Grading. The project's proposed excavation and grading activities have the <br /> potential to destabilize existing buried utilities and building foundations, or to <br /> create conditions that would potentially compromise the safety or stability of <br /> proposed project improvements. The project applicant's preliminary geotechnical <br /> investigations (Lowney Reports I and II; and Cornerstone Earth Group, March <br /> 2008) made initial assessments of these conditions, but a design-level <br /> geotechnical investigation will be needed to adequately address all grading and <br /> excavation activities on the development site. Without such a study--and without <br /> the associated supervision of an engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer <br /> during project grading and construction--the safety and long-term stability of <br /> existing and proposed project improvements cannot be assured. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 15-1. As recommended by the project's preliminary geotechnical <br /> investigations, prior to City issuance of grading permits for individual project <br /> construction phases, the applicant shall be required to retain a registered <br /> engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer to prepare detailed, design-level <br /> geotechnical investigations to guide the design of all project grading and <br /> excavation activities. The detailed, design-level geotechnical investigations shall <br /> be performed for each of the structures proposed for the development site. <br /> Subsurface conditions shall be explored and laboratory tests conducted on <br /> selected soil samples to establish strength parameters for the design of <br /> excavations, retained slopes and fill placement, and to determine the corrosive <br /> potential of both Bay mud and imported fill on foundation elements and buried <br /> utilities. Recommendations from the investigations shall be incorporated into all <br /> plans for project grading, excavation, soil support (both temporary and long-term) <br /> and utility construction, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. <br /> The detailed, design-level investigations, relevant recommendations, and all <br /> associated project grading, excavation and foundation plans, shall be subject to <br /> review and approval by an independent engineering geologist or geotechnical <br /> engineer retained by the City Engineer at applicant expense. In addition, the <br /> project civil engineer shall certify to the City Engineer (e.g., through plan <br /> submittal for City review) that all relevant provisions of the investigations have <br /> been incorporated into the grading, excavation and construction plans, and all <br /> earthwork and site preparation shall be performed under the direct supervision of <br /> a registered engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer. <br /> Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 15-1 would reduce the potential excavation and <br /> grading impacts to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 15-1 would reduce potential <br /> excavation and grading impacts to a less-than-significant level by requiring <br /> detailed, site-specific geotechnical investigations and solutions prepared by a <br /> registered engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer, with review and <br /> approval authority by the City Engineer. These facts are described in Draft EIR <br /> chapter 15 (Geology and Soils) on pages 15-1 through 15-15, which is hereby <br /> incorporated by reference. <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 <br /> REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 <br /> Page 17 of 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.