My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15305
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:59 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/18/2013
Description
RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL BY 605 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD LLC, AND MODIFYING THE SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS, TO APPROVE THE TENTATIVE MAP, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND PLANNED COMMUNITY PERMIT, THE 525 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD PROJECT AS REVISED ON NOVEMBER 8, 2013, ALL PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY'S DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br /> 11/18/2013 CAPCOA <br /> • • • <br /> MP#LU-1.7&LU-2.1.1.4 PDT-1 Parking Policy/ Pricing <br /> Example: <br /> If the ITE parking generation rate for the project is 100 spaces, for a low range a 5% <br /> reduction in spaces is assumed. For a high range a 25% reduction in spaces is <br /> assumed. <br /> • Low range % VMT Reduction = [(100 - 95)/100] * 0.5 = 2.5°/a <br /> • High range % VMT Reduction = [(100 - 75)/100] * 0.5 = 12.5% <br /> Preferred Literature: <br /> To develop this model, Nelson\Nygaard [1] used the Institute of Transportation <br /> Engineers' Parking Generation handbook as the baseline figure for parking supply. This <br /> is assumed to be unconstrained demand. Trip reduction should only be credited if <br /> measures are implemented to control for spillover parking in and around the project, <br /> such as residential parking permits, metered parking, or time-limited parking. <br /> Alternative Literature: <br /> • 100% increase in transit ridership <br /> • 100°/a increase in transit mode share <br /> According to TCRP Report 95, Chapter 18 [2], the central business district of Portland, <br /> Oregon implemented a maximum parking ratio of 1 space per 1,000 square feet of new <br /> buildings and implemented surface lot restrictions which limited conditions where <br /> buildings could be razed for parking.A "before and after" study was not conducted <br /> specifically for the maximum parking requirements and data comes from various <br /> surveys and published reports. Based on rough estimates the approximate parking ratio <br /> of 3.4 per 1,000 square feet in 1973 (for entire downtown) had been reduce to 1.5 by <br /> 1990. Transit mode share increased from 20% to 40%. The increases in transit ridership <br /> and mode share are not solely from maximum parking requirements. Other companion <br /> strategies, such as market parking pricing and high fuel costs, were in place. <br /> Alternative Literature Sources: <br /> [1] TCRP Report 95, Chapter 18: Parking Management and Supply: Traveler Response <br /> to Transportation System Changes. (p. 18-6) <br /> http://onlinepubs.trb.org/online u� /p tcr��-��95c18.Rdf <br /> Other Literature Reviewed: <br /> None <br /> 209 PDT-1 <br /> 3 RESO.#15305 <br /> MUFF#603 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.