Laserfiche WebLink
one of the three identified tributaries, it would still not qualify as protected <br /> insofar as it is located within a concrete channel and culvert. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered the Revised Final EIR for the Project, <br /> and the Revised Final EIR reflects the City Council's independent judgment. <br /> 5. The City Council affirms and adopts the CEQA Findings of Fact and the <br /> Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan previously adopted by the Planning <br /> Commission in Resolution No. 13-04 (A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the <br /> City of Redwood City Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Laurel <br /> Way Planned Development Project; Adopting CEQA Findings; and Adopting a <br /> Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, all in accordance with the Requirements of <br /> the California Environmental Quality Act). <br /> 6. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other <br /> materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has <br /> based its decision are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City Clerk <br /> at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of <br /> records for all matters before the City. <br /> 7. In denying the appeals (with the limited exception described above) and <br /> approving Planned Development Permit No. PD2011-03, the City Council affirms and <br /> adopts the findings and conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission in <br /> Resolution No. 13-05 (A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of <br /> Redwood City Approving a Planned Development Permit and Lot Combination for the <br /> Laurel Way Joint Venture Project), with the exception of the modification of Condition <br /> 19 described above. <br /> * * * <br /> ATTY/RES0.2935/RESO DENYING THE APPEAL OF IAUREL WAY RESO.#15311 <br /> REV:12-12-13 PT MUFF#603 <br /> Page 7 of 7 <br />