My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res17 15632
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res17 15632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:57:27 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:57:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/4/2017
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY APPROVING THE EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REDWOOD CITY EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR PLAN <br />18 <br />SectION 1 .2 <br />BI c Yc L ING <br />CONTEXT <br />While people can bicycle on El Camino Real, it feels danger- <br />ous. The only bike facility within the approximately two mile <br />El Camino Real Corridor is a one-block Class III bike route, <br />designated with sharrows, between Broadway and Brewster <br />Avenue; there are no physically protected areas for bicyclists <br />or even striped bike lanes. Even confident cyclists may hesi- <br />tate to ride on such a busy road with fast-moving vehicles <br />and no dedicated bike facility. <br />Accommodating bicycles on El Camino Real would not be <br />so important if there were sufficient parallel roadways that <br />were both close by (one to two blocks off) and continuous. <br />While there are a few stretches of road that fulfil this need <br />(such as Stafford and Arguello streets on the east side and <br />Adams Street on the west side), they do not create a con- <br />tinuous, efficient bicycle alternative to El Camino Real. Other <br />major parallel routes, such as Hudson Street and Middlefield <br />Road, are a quarter to a half mile away. <br />In addition, there are few amenities for cyclists along El <br />Camino Real, such as secure bike racks or signage to other <br />bike routes or destinations. <br />WHY IMPROVE CONDITIONS FOR <br />PEOPLE RIDING BICYCLES? <br />Bicycles are great for trips that are just a little bit too long <br />for walking but not long enough to merit getting in the <br />car. They are an efficient and inexpensive mode of trans- <br />portation—both for people riding them and for the City to <br />support through infrastructure. While not appropriate for <br />every person and every trip, they enable many people to <br />make short, convenient trips; reduce their dependence on <br />cars; and get exercise, contributing to public health. Red- <br />wood City benefits from relatively flat terrain (particularly <br />along El Camino Real) and good weather for much of the <br />year. Businesses on corridors that are accessible to bicycles <br />also see benefits from the increased activity and improved <br />street front visibility, particularly when secure bicycle parking <br />is available nearby. <br />If bicycling is to be successful on El Camino Real, ensuring <br />safety is of paramount importance. Public input to date has <br />provided strong support for separated bikeways with a physi- <br />cal barrier (known as Class IV). Physical barriers improve safety <br />for people riding bicycles as well as for people driving cars <br />next to them. Pedestrians are also safer when bicyclists have a <br />safe place to ride on the roadway and stay off the sidewalks. <br />Currently, the only bike facility on El Camino <br />Real is a one-block Class III bike route be- <br />tween Broadway and Brewster Avenue. Class <br />III routes are not separated from vehicle <br />traffic. Source: Google Street View
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.