Laserfiche WebLink
• Develop a community that includes quality architecture, landscape, and streetscape to <br />capitalize on "placemaking" features that define Redwood City's harbor; <br />• Activate and beautify the waterfront by creating key public recreation amenities via the <br />Bay Trail. Help the City prioritize the waterfront for public -oriented and water -dependent <br />uses and activities; <br />• Accommodate educational use amenities along the Bay Trail that invite hands-on <br />learning experiences that feature the history and ecology of Redwood City; <br />• Contribute to a pedestrian and bike recreational thoroughfare connecting Downtown <br />Redwood City to the waterfront that addresses circulation, visual, and aesthetic <br />concerns; <br />• Provide housing at a scale and density appropriate to the project site and sufficient to <br />support the creation of public waterfront amenities; <br />• Provide a blend of habitat, recreational, and residential uses within the harbor area; <br />• Preserve potential historical resources via relocation of the existing water tank to <br />adjacent City -owned property; <br />• Fortify the site against future sea level rise by raising the site significantly; <br />• Mitigate lead in soil and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soil gas as part of project <br />construction; and <br />• Mitigate environmental hazards on the site as identified by soils investigations. <br />Discussion of Findings Relating to the Alternatives <br />The FEIR evaluates the proposed project against two (2) alternatives, summarized below <br />(Chapter 6, pages 277-288 of the DEIR). Of these, the Reduced Development alternative is <br />the environmentally superior alternative as it would result in an overall smaller development <br />footprint and shorter construction period, would not generate any new significant impacts, <br />and would avoid impacts to the Water Tank. <br />The No Project alternative assumes that neither the proposed project nor the project <br />variant would be developed and that the project site would generally remain in its current <br />condition. The project site would continue to be occupied by and used for site <br />maintenance activities, marina -related storage, diesel engine repair, and marina <br />operations. The existing Water Tank would remain in its current location. <br />2. The Reduced Development alternative would result in redevelopment of the site with a <br />residential townhome community. However, the total number of units would be reduced <br />to 92 units. Buildings M, H, G, and F would not be developed and a portion of these <br />areas would instead by developed with open space consisting of a public park. In <br />addition, Buildings I and E would also not be developed and the existing Water Tank <br />would be retained on site and additional open space and landscaping would be <br />developed around this structure. Open space, circulation and parking, infrastructure, soil <br />remediation, and grading improvements would generally still occur, as well as the partial <br />extension of Blomquist Street. <br />ATTY/RESO.0035/CC RESO CERTIFYING FINAL EIR — 1548 MAPLE RESO. NO. 15661 <br />REV: 04-30-18 PR MUFF NO. 601 <br />Page 23 of 49 <br />