My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res19 15780
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res19 15780
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 8:01:53 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 8:01:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/24/2019
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY APPROVING THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISION C.3.J OF THE MUNICIPAL REGIONAL PERMIT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REDWOOD CITY <br />maintain the public -realm landscaping in the area. The landscape staff used to <br />maintain this landscaping can be trained in GI maintenance practices and <br />qualified in sustainable landscaping services. <br />Infrastructure Financing Districts: Infrastructure financing districts (IFD), a <br />relatively new funding mechanism, may develop into a viable mechanism. IFDs <br />have emerged as a potential replacement for Redevelopment Agencies, which <br />were eliminated in 2012. Cities and counties may create IFDs to capture ad <br />valorem tax increments, similar to the now -defunct Redevelopment Agencies, <br />to invest within the specific IFD boundaries. IFDs are not limited to blighted <br />areas and can directly, or through 30 -year bonds, fund local infrastructure <br />including highways, transit, water systems, sewer projects, flood control, <br />childcare facilities, libraries, parks, and solid waste facilities. However, the <br />formation of an IFD requires consent from all the impacted local agencies <br />(school districts are exempt from IFDs) and two-thirds support from eligible <br />voters within the IFD boundaries. Both of these are high hurdles, which may <br />explain why so few IFDs have been Formed. In addition, IFDs cannot pay for <br />maintenance, repairs, operating costs, and services, and IFDs do not have <br />access to the school's portion of the property tax increment. <br />In 2014, the California Legislature approved the Enhanced Infrastructure <br />Financing District (EIFD) structure, in part to offer an alternative to the recently <br />banned redevelopment structure. Unlike the IFD, it does not require voter <br />approval unless bonds are to be issued. Like the IFD, the schools' portion of <br />property tax increment is not available. This financing structure may be a good <br />fit for localized areas where stormwater infrastructure and quality, and <br />particularly environmental clean-up on private properties, are major concerns. <br />An EIFD can be created with multiple municipalities, so it can span political <br />boundaries making it a good fit for a watershed approach to GI funding. <br />RWC GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />38 JUNE 2019 <br />ATTY/RESO.0075/CC RESO APPROVING THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN — EXHIBITA RESO. NO. 15780 <br />REV: 06-20-19 PR MUFF NO. 802 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.