My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-11-05
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-11-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2008 11:48:30 AM
Creation date
11/1/2007 12:27:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
11/5/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br /> <br />Q: What is the revenue loss to the City? Page 11 <br />A: Once granted a Mills Act Contract, a property owner saves approximately 40% to <br />60% of the individual assessed tax valuation of the property. Since the City collects <br />approximately 20% of the 1 % of property valuation tax, an estimated loss of revenue to <br />the City for a property valuated at $750,000 would be $560 (40%) to $840 (60%). <br /> <br />Q. How does this benefit the City? <br />A. Because of the yearly maintenance inspection requirement associated with Mills Act <br />contracts, a mandated design review process for exterior changes and required <br />compliance to the Secretary of Interior's Standards, the City gains a powerful tool to <br />insure the long term preservation of properties under contract. Property owners commit <br />to a high quality maintenance program which typically affects the property values of the <br />neighborhood and reflects positively in Community pride and character. <br /> <br />GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING COMPLIANCE <br />The designation of historic landmarks and implementation of Mills Act Contracts for the <br />long term preservation of the Community's historic resources is one of the primary goals <br />and objectives of the Historic Resource Element of the General Plan. The historic <br />designation does not affect the zoning regulations which are currently applicable to the <br />subject property. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />The proposed historic designation seeks to insure the long term preservation of the <br />subject resource which is exempt from CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) <br />review, per section 15331, Class 31 of the CEQA guidelines. <br /> <br />PUBLIC NOTIFICATION <br />A public hearing notice and regarding this item was advertised in the paper and sent to <br />the owner/applicant in compliance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. <br /> <br />FUTURE STEPS <br />As outlined in Section 40.7 of the Municipal Code, the next step in the historic <br />designation process involves the following: <br /> <br />The City Council must hold a public hearing within 30 days of the Planning Commission <br />recommendation: <br /> <br />a. To consider and take action on the designation of the subject property as an <br />historic landmark and make the appropriate findings, per section 40.6 of the <br />Redwood City Code. <br /> <br />b. If the City Council designates the subject property as a historic landmark, the <br />City Council will also consider the Planning Commission's recommendation <br />on the adoption of a Mills Act Contract for the subject property per section <br />40.5 K of the Redwood City Municipal Code. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />a) Historic designation: <br />"Approve in whole or in part or disapprove, in whole or in part the application"...per <br />section 40.7 G of the Redwood City Municipal Code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.