My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res04 14590
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res04 14590
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:54:01 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:53:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/7/2004
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS CONCERNING MITIGATION MEASURES, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR MARINA SHORES VILLAGE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City <br />Page 52 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT 645 <br />MOovi PORING <br />VERIFIUATION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT <br />RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE <br />hnpl. <br />Type of Impl. <br />Monitoring and <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />Date <br />(CONDITION OF APPROVAL) <br />Entity <br />Action <br />Verification Entity <br />Requirements <br />additional improved parkland at a location or <br />Permit, or subdivision map, <br />locations so as to be available for use by <br />requirements of the Strategic Plan shall <br />project residents would be required to serve <br />apply to that approval as a condition of <br />the park needs of the projected 4,020 project <br />issuance; or <br />residents (i.e., 3,910 net new residents); <br />currently, no improved parkland exists within a <br />(2) As part of Precise Plan formulation for <br />(2) Appli- <br />(2) If deemed <br />(2) City <br />(2) Prior to <br />convenient walking distance (e.g., less than <br />the project, the City Community <br />cant/City <br />necessary, revise <br />Precise Plan <br />1/2 -mile) of the project site. The proposed <br />Development Services Department and <br />site plan to <br />adoption <br />project includes approximately 15.8 acres of <br />Parks, Recreation and Community <br />incorporate <br />common landscape/hardscape open space to <br />Services Department shall decide what, <br />sufficient on -site <br />be shared between residents, visitors, and the <br />if any, credit would be applied toward <br />parkland and <br />general public. This open space would <br />meeting the project's parks and <br />amenities. <br />include public pedestrian and bicycle paths, <br />recreation needs, based on a total <br />public plazas and promenades, and a <br />projected need of approximately 6.8 <br />proposed link to the planned San Francisco <br />acres of additional improved parkland, <br />Bay Trail extension (not yet designed). Also, <br />through provision of common open <br />the project's conceptual landscape plans <br />space, the proposed adjacent <br />include a proposed approximately two -acre <br />community park (should development <br />community park, but this adjacent off -site land <br />rights be granted by the USFW S), and <br />is owned by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />the proposed link to the planned San <br />(USFWS); the project applicant currently does <br />Francisco Bay Trail extension. If <br />not have development rights to this property. <br />determined necessary by the City, the <br />developer shall revise the project site <br />Project effects on City parks and recreation <br />plan to incorporate on -site parkland <br />services would represent a potentially <br />with amenities sufficient to serve the <br />significant impact <br />project residents. <br />Implementation of either one of these <br />mitigation measures would reduce project <br />impacts on park facilities and recreational <br />programs to a less- than - significant level. <br />Impact 10 -9: Solid Waste Diversion <br />Mitigation 10 -9. The final project <br />Applicant <br />Include bins and <br />City <br />Prior to <br />Impacts. Due to the tower design of a large <br />architectural design shall include chutes for <br />chutes for <br />occupancy <br />portion of the project, the project has the <br />recyclable materials immediately adjacent to <br />recyclables in <br />potential to conflict with state - mandated <br />the garbage chutes, or at another suitable <br />residences. <br />requirements for 50 percent solid waste <br />location approved by the City, in the <br />stream diversion if residents find the locations <br />residential towers. Bins for storage of <br />of recycling bins to be too distant or <br />recyclables shall be provided for each <br />inconvenient. Site and project plans <br />residential tower unit. The City shall ensure <br />submitted at this time do not provide enough <br />that these provisions are included in project <br />detail to determine if adequate provisions for <br />construction prior to issuance of a <br />recycling have been included in project <br />Certificate of Occupancy. Implementation <br />Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City <br />Page 52 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT 645 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.