Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

06/07/2004 X. Cumulative (2020) Impact on U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed -Flow Lanes, Woodside Road to Marsh Road Segment — AM Peak Hour Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by all other approved and pending projects in the vicinity, the Project is expected to increase traffic volumes by more than one percent of the U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed - Flow Lanes, Woodside Road to Marsh Road segment's capacity during the AM peak hour, a period during which traffic volume would already be expected to exceed capacity on this segment even absent the addition of Project - generated traffic (Impact 7 -23). Mitigation: The project applicant shall design and implement a comprehensive TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7 -2 (Mitigation 7 -23). Findings: Mitigation 7 -23 is feasible and will help to partially mitigate Impact 7 -23. However, mitigation of this impact to a less- than - significant level would require the addition of another southbound through lane to the freeway segment, which is not feasible because this freeway widening would require multiple approvals from multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources beyond the capacity of any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the cumulative impact described above is significant and unavoidable. Y. Cumulative (2020) Impact on Westbound SR 84, County Line to University Avenue and University Avenue to Willow Road Segments — AM Peak Hour Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by all other approved and pending projects in the vicinity, the Project is expected to increase traffic volumes by more than one percent of capacity on Westbound SR 84, County Line to University Avenue and University Avenue to Willow Road during the AM peak hour, a period during which traffic volume would already be expected to exceed capacity on these segments even absent the addition of Project - generated traffic (Impact 7 -24). Mitigation: The project applicant shall design and implement a comprehensive TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7 -2 (Mitigation 7 -24). Findings: Mitigation 7 -24 is feasible and will help to partially mitigate Impact 7 -24. However, mitigation of this impact to a less- than - significant level would require the addition of another westbound through lane to both freeway segments, which is not feasible because this freeway widening would require multiple approvals from multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources beyond the capacity of any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the cumulative impact described above is significant and unavoidable. 1289 \02 \179278.2 18 Atty /Reso /Reso.1470 14590 060804 Muff # 304 Bin 26