Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 7 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MG. ORING VERIFIG... tON IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requirements level, and thus would result in a significant unavoidable visual impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 5 -3: General Visual Compatibility Mitigation 5 -3. Implement one of the Impact. The project's architectural design following two alternative mitigations: concept is generally compatible with attractive new development in the immediate vicinity. Mitigation Altemative 5 -3 -1: Reduce Applicant/ Redesign project to City Prior to Precise However, the proposed project would project building heights to a maximum City incorporate 50 -foot Plan adoption substantially increase the height, mass, scale, of four stories and/or 50 feet, consistent and/or four -story and intensity of development on the site. The with the general scale of adjacent and maximum building project's 17 residential towers and one nearby development. Orient project heights and hotel /office tower, would be over five times the buildings to relate to existing adjacent building orientation height of the tallest structures in the buildings and open spaces (also see toward existing immediate vicinity. The mid -rise residential Mitigation 5 -5). Implementation of this buildings and open and office buildings would be approximately measure would reduce general visual space; or two times the height of the tallest structures in compatibility impact to a less -than- incorporate design the immediate vicinity. The project height significant level. standards and would have a significant visual guidelines into compatibility impact. OR Precise Plan requiring City Mitigation Alternative 5 -3 -2: Implement adoption. Mitigation Altemative 5 -1 -2 (adoption of a Precise Plan). This mitigation would substantially reduce project visual compatibility impacts, but not to a less - than- significant level, and thus would result in a significant unavoidable visual Impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 5 -4: Potential Light and Glare Mitigation 5 -4. Implement the following Applicant Design project City Prior to Design Impacts. Lighting in the outdoor spaces of measures: lighting to minimize Review the proposed project and interior lighting light spillage, and (Architectural) emanating from structures could create light Design project lighting to confine design screening of Permit approval and glare impacts on surrounding residences, illumination to the project site, sensitive adjacent commercial properties, and recreational minimizing light spillage to adjacent uses. For buildings areas. Additionally, daytime light reflection residences, offices, commercial uses, over 50 feet in from the windows of the tower structures and public open space and recreational height, install tinted could create glare impacts on the surrounding areas. Use cut -off fixtures for outdoor windows. Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 7 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645