Laserfiche WebLink
06/07/2004 <br />make these impacts unavoidable. The impacts could be avoided only by relocating the <br />towers and lines, which is not feasible. Relocation is not within the control of the City or <br />project sponsor, would be prohibitively expensive and would require multiple approvals <br />at alternative locations by bodies other than the City, which are unlikely to be <br />obtainable. <br />B. Industrial and Airport Compatibility <br />Potential Impact: Comments received as part of the preparation and <br />certification process of the FEIR indicated that Project has the potential to significantly <br />impact Airport operations, specifically aircraft landings and take -offs. As a result, the <br />Planning Commission determined that mitigation measures were necessary. <br />Mitigation: Real estate disclosures concerning proximity to an airport as <br />included in the Project conditions of approval are necessary to mitigate airport <br />operations impacts to less than significant levels [Mitigation 12 -1]. <br />Findings: Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce airport <br />operations impacts to less than significant levels. <br />C. Project Density and Height in Relation to Adjacent Residences <br />Potential Impact: The density and height of the larger residential <br />buildings of the Project would differ from the mass, scale and height of adjacent <br />residential developments and present visual compatibility, light and glare and shadow <br />impacts on those developments (EIR Impact 4 -2). <br />Mitigation: The Project is being approved pursuant to a City of Redwood <br />City Precise Plan which requires a carefully- drafted set of design principles, including <br />setbacks, tapering heights, floor area limitations, building spacing and surface and <br />fagade detailing, which will significantly reduce perceived height, mass, scale and <br />intensity of the Project and its visual and shadow impacts on adjacent properties <br />(MMRP Mitigation 5 -1 -2). Project lighting would be designed to confine illumination to <br />the Project site, minimizing light affecting adjacent residences; cut -off fixtures would be <br />used for outdoor areas, and screening would be provide from sensitive adjacent uses <br />(MMRP Mitigation 5 -4). <br />Findings: The identified mitigations for light and glare are feasible and <br />would reduce light and glare impacts on adjacent residential properties to a less than <br />significant level. The Precise Plan design principles are a feasible mitigation measure, <br />but even under the Precise Plan the mass, scale, height and intensity of the Project, its <br />general visual compatibility with existing adjacent residential development and its <br />shadows would remain potentially significant impacts. These impacts could be made <br />insignificant only by drastically reducing the height, number and size of residential <br />buildings in the Project, which would render it infeasible because the remaining number <br />of units would not be sufficient to recover the cost of infrastructure and other <br />improvements required to develop the site and because the number of affordable and <br />other new residential units would be drastically reduced, preventing realization of a <br />1289 \02 \179278.2 2 <br />Atty /Reso /Reso.1470 14590 <br />060804 Muff # 304 Bin 26 <br />