Laserfiche WebLink
Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City <br />Page 49 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 <br />Mu,ATORING <br />VERIFIt;ATION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT <br />RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE <br />Impl. <br />Type of Impl. <br />Monitoring and <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />Date <br />(CONDITION OF APPROVAL) <br />Entity <br />Action <br />Verification Entity <br />Requirements <br />reduce the impact of project- related <br />increases in police service demands to a <br />less -than- significant level. <br />Impact 10 -4: Emergency Response and <br />Mitigation 10 -4. Implement mitigation <br />Applicant/ <br />Implement chapter <br />City <br />See individual <br />Evacuation Impacts. Project - related traffic <br />measures identified in chapter 7 <br />City <br />7 mitigations (City/ <br />mitigations <br />would create additional traffic congestion on <br />(Transportation and Circulation) of this EIR <br />applicant). <br />(chapter 7); prior <br />Bair Island Road, East Bayshore Road, and <br />to reduce project - related traffic impacts on <br />Implement <br />to tentative map <br />other local roadways, possibly delaying <br />Bair Island Road, East Bayshore Road, and <br />emergency access <br />approval <br />emergency response and limiting the Police <br />other local roads to less- than - significant <br />provisions <br />(emergency <br />Department's ability to evacuate the project <br />levels. In addition, require City review and <br />(applicant). <br />access) <br />vicinity safely during an emergency or major <br />approval of project - proposed emergency <br />disaster. These possible project effects on <br />access provisions prior to tentative <br />emergency response and evacuation in the <br />subdivision map approval. Implementation <br />project vicinity would represent a potentially <br />of these measures would reduce project <br />significant impact. <br />impacts on emergency response and <br />evacuation to a less - than - significant level. <br />Impact 10 -5: Cumulative Demands for <br />Mitigation 10 -5. Implement Mitigation 10 -3. <br />Applicant/ <br />Implement chapter <br />City <br />See individual <br />Police Services. Buildout of the project in <br />This measure would reduce the project <br />City <br />7 mitigations (City/ <br />mitigations <br />combination with other anticipated cumulative <br />contribution to this cumulative impact to a <br />applicant). <br />(chapter 7); prior <br />(pending, recently approved, or recently <br />less -than- significant level. <br />Implement <br />to tentative map <br />constructed) residential development in the <br />emergency access <br />approval <br />city by the year 2015, would increase the <br />provisions <br />(emergency <br />demand for police services, including an <br />(applicant). <br />access) <br />estimated need for 20 additional sworn <br />officers, and requisite training, support staff, <br />facilities, and equipment. Without <br />corresponding incremental increases in police <br />service provisions, this effect would represent <br />a potentially significant cumulative impact. <br />Impact 10 -6: Project - Related and <br />Mitigation 10 -6. The City shall use <br />Applicant/ <br />Fund departmental <br />City <br />Funding prior to <br />Cumulative Increases in Fire Protection <br />property tax revenue flow increases from <br />City <br />improvements with <br />project <br />and Emergency Medical Service Demands. <br />the project to the City's general fund to <br />project property <br />occupancy; plan <br />Buildout of the proposed project, in <br />annually fund ongoing fire and emergency <br />taxes and, if <br />review prior to <br />combination with other anticipated cumulative <br />medical service needs generated by the <br />necessary, fair- <br />tentative map <br />(pending, recently approved, or recently <br />project. In addition, to the extent necessary, <br />share contributions; <br />approval; <br />constructed) residential development in the <br />the City should require individual <br />project design per <br />determination of <br />city by the year 2015, would increase <br />development projects, including the Marina <br />Fire Dept. <br />service <br />demands for fire protection and emergency <br />Shores Village project, to provide a fair- <br />standards or City- <br />adequacy prior <br />medical services provided by the Redwood <br />share contribution toward provision of new <br />approved <br />to occupancy r' <br />City Fire Department (RCFD). The estimated <br />staff facilities and equipment costs which <br />equivalent <br />each project <br />4,020 project residents (3,910 total net new <br />exceed general fund capacity. The City <br />alternatives. <br />phase <br />Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City <br />Page 49 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 <br />