My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res05 14645
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res05 14645
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:54:46 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:54:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/23/2005
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY ADOPTING A POLICY FOR THE PRICING OF RECYCLED WATER.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5/23/2005 <br />ORIGINAL <br />RESOLUTION NO. 14645 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br />CITY ADOPTING A POLICY FOR THE PRICING OF RECYCLED <br />WATER. <br />WHEREAS, the City of Redwood City ( "City ") currently provides water services to <br />a variety of customers, and <br />WHEREAS, in December 2002, a Water Financing Plan (the "Plan ") was <br />completed Bartle Wells Associates, Independent Public Finance Advisors as part of the <br />feasibility planning process for a recycled water project; and <br />WHEREAS, on January 24, 2005, the City Council approved the Plan's 2004 <br />update which, in part, discussed outstanding policy issues including the pricing of <br />recycled water; and <br />WHEREAS, the Plan's 2004 update includes Policy Assumption No. 10, Table A- <br />1 which reads: "Recycled water rates are assumed to be set at 75% of potable water <br />rates for financial planning purposes and will not be subject to drought rate increases. <br />We recommend that the Council consider the pricing policy for recycled water carefully <br />and in the context of the adopted policy of no mandatory connection requirements to <br />ensure that sufficient voluntary connections are achieved pursuant to the approved <br />[project] Alternative 'TF'. "; and <br />WHEREAS, the practice of delivering recycled water at a lower retail cost than <br />drinking water is wide - spread in the water utility sector to generate timely momentum <br />and interest in the initiative; and <br />WHEREAS, with regard to landscape irrigation uses, the above described pricing <br />practice takes into account the following rationales: <br />• Projects must be able to connect customers quickly once expensive pipelines are <br />built, so financial incentives for gaining commitments are an effective tool. <br />• Customers will be inconvenienced during retrofit of their sites and during <br />construction of pipelines. A cost reduction helps decision - makers find long term <br />benefit to mitigate short term inconveniences and disruptions. <br />• Once connected, recycled water customers are regulated by the City, and usually <br />need to spend more time — and money — managing their sites to meet use <br />requirements which include annual system audits. Other agencies have reported <br />that lower water costs help customers maintain their commitments; and <br />WHEREAS, in the case of Redwood City industrial users, staff has heard <br />consistently that this customer group expects to pay for and perform all facilities <br />retrofits, as they are the most knowledgeable about their plants and processes and in <br />Atty /Reso /Reso.1539 1 14645 <br />051605 Muff # 506 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.