Res07 14769 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

p D MONITORING VERIFICATION IDEND IMPACT RELATED MlT1GATiON MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing 5ignatare Date ~ Enti Verification Enti Re uirements Impact 6: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-16. Adding an exclusive City, fair-share City If and when improvements Cumulate Impacts at the Broadwayl northbound left-tum [one on Broadway and reimbursement adopted, City shall conduct Jeffersovenue Intersection. During the converting the existing northbound-shared from future Gnnual traffic monitoring at PM pea our, the addition of project traffic left-through right lane into a shared individual this intersection and would inRaease average delay by more than through/right-tum lane would result in project implement fair-share five (5} seconds at this intersection, which improved LOS F operation with less applicants. requirement when level of would alr~dy be operating at LOS F. This average delay than that experienced under service reaches LOSE „ effect w represent a significanf impact. Cumulative (W ithaut Project) Conditions. (average delay of greatrri~ than Implementation of this mitigation would 55 seconds}. therefore reduce the project impact to a less-than-significant level. or Because this mitigation would result in the loss of sidewalk at corner bulb-outs, degrading the existng and future pedestrian environment and sidewalk dining opportunities, and would be inconsistent with City policies giving priority to the Downtown pedestrian environment, the City may choose to avoid this intersection modification in the interest of protecting the pedestrian environment. This choice would result in a significanf unavoidable impact based on current CEO.A and City criteria for "Intersection Inv acts:' Impact 9-17: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-17. The intersection of City; fair-share City If and when improvements Cumulative Impacts at the Broadway! Broadway/Middlefield Road is currently a 4- reimbursement adopted, City shalt conduct Middlefield Intersection. During the PM way stop controlled intersection. from future annual traffic monitoring at average delay would increase by peak hour Signalizing the intersection (2-phase individual this intersection and , five (5) seconds or more at this intersectlon, control) would result in LOS C operations project li t implement fair-share requirement when level of which already would be operating at LOS F. under Cumulative (With Project) Conditions app can s. service reaches LOS E This effect would represent a sign cant during the PM peak hour. Implementation of this measure would result in a less-than- (average delay of greater than impact. signifrcant impact 55 seconds}. or Because this signalization mitigation would- (a) tie less supportive of pedestrian convenience and orientation than the existing 4-way stop due to delays to ~ pedestrians waiting to cross during "walk" = phases and higher vehiGe speeds through ~ j the intersection; (b} be inconsistent with ~ .A City intentions for this intersection to be p ~ pedestrian-oriented given its location in the ~,,~ ~p Downtown core; and (c) be inconsistent with City policies giving priority to the Downtown edestrian environment the Ci Page 16 U:1My Documentsli7o~Nntown Prec+se PIaMCC staff reporisiCC 3.12.dcrc43.12.07 ExhrbitslAttachment A mit. monrtori;~g checklist 655.doc