Laserfiche WebLink
O MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> <br />IDEt~F~D IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation iNonitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Enti Verification Enti R uirements <br />O - a parking cash-out program for <br />O employees (where non-driving <br />~7 employees receive <br />fD transportation allowance <br />N <br />O equivalent to the value of <br />s subsidized parking). <br />a7 <br />~ <br />Implementation of these measures would <br />~''~ assist in reducir+g identified Prease Plan- <br /> related and cumulative impacts on long- <br /> term regional ROG, NOz, and PM,o <br /> emission levels by perhaps 5 to 10 percent <br /> beyond what the proposed Prease Pian <br /> itself may achieve through its "trip <br /> internalization" and alternative modes <br /> effects; however, since reductions of (in <br /> some cases) over 70 percent would be <br /> required to bring project-related regional <br /> emission increases to below BAAQMD <br /> significance thresholds, the project and <br /> cumulative effects on ROG, NOx, and PM,o <br /> emission levels would represent a <br /> si nificant unavoidable im act. <br /> <br />BtOLOGiCAL RESOURCES <br />Impact 14-1: Potential Loss of Heritage Mitigation 14-1. Prior to, or as a condition Individual City Condition of grading permit <br />issuance; field veri <br />Trees. Under either the Maximum or <br />ti of, finalization of plans for future individual <br />development projects in the Precise Pian project <br />applicants implementation Burin rad'sn <br />g g g <br />ve, <br />Moderate intensity Prease Plan alterna <br />future development in accordance with the area, require that any proposed tree and construction. <br />Prease Plan may result in the removal of removal be subject to the application and <br />' <br />heritage trees as defined by the City's Tree s Tree <br />review process speafred in the City <br />Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code <br />chapter 35). This possibility represents a chapter 35). Implementation of this <br />potentially significant impact. measure would ensure protection of <br /> heritage trees, thereby mitigating potential <br /> im acts to a less-than-sf nitlcantlevet. _- <br />Impact 14-2: Potential loss of Special- Mitigation 14-2. If disturbance of suitable Individua! City During project-specific <br />environmE:ntal review <br />Status Species. Under either the Maximum habitat is proposed as part of future project <br />individual development projects in the applicants <br />or Moderate Intensity Precise Plan <br />future Precise Ptan-facilitated <br />alternative <br />vicinity of Redwood Creek, require surveys i <br />~ <br />, <br />dev~pment in the vicinity of Redwood Creek prior to finalization of such projects in order t <br />ma~esult in the loss of special-status to determine definitively whether any I <br />sperms-This passibility is considered to be a specal-status speaes occur in the affected <br />pot~t~fy significant impact. area. Such surveys shall be conducted by <br />bl I <br />~ <br /> e <br />a qualified botanist following applica <br />~ <br />W ~ <br />guidelines of the California Department of ~ <br />- <br /> Fish and Garr>z and/or U.S. Fish and <br /> Wildlife Service to rovide a conclusive <br />Page 32 U:1My Documentsl0owrrtown Precise Ptan1CC staff reporfslCC 3.12.doc13.12.07 Ex6ibifslAttachmenf A mil. m~3nitonng checklist 655.doc <br />