My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res08 14880
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res08 14880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:57:29 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:57:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/28/2008
Description
A RESOLUTION OPPOSING FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE STATE BUDGET DECISIONS THAT WOULD "BORROW" LOCAL GOVERNMENT, REDEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />07/28/2008 <br /> <br />ORIGINAL <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 14880 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OPPOSING FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE STATE <br />BUDGET DECISIONS THAT WOULD "BORROW" LOCAL <br />GOVERNMENT, REDEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDS <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on July 1, 2008 the State Legislature missed its Constitutional <br /> <br />budget deadline; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, both the Governor and the Legislative Budget Conference <br /> <br />Committee have recommended balanced budgets without resorting to "loans" or <br /> <br />seizures of local government property tax, redevelopment tax increment and <br /> <br />transportation sales tax funds; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in 1952 the voters of California approved Article XVI, Section 16 of <br /> <br />the California Constitution, providing for tax increment financing for community <br /> <br />revitalization-not balancing the state budget, and the voters never authorized the <br /> <br />legislature to take or "borrow" community redevelopment funds for state programs; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in 2004 by an 84% margin of approval the voters of California <br /> <br />approved Proposition 1 A and sent a loud and unambiguous message to state leaders <br /> <br />that they should stop the destructive and irresponsible practice of taking local <br /> <br />government funds to finance the state budget and paper over the state deficit; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in 2006 by a 77% margin of approval the voters of California also <br /> <br />approved Proposition 1 A, providing similar protections to transportation funding for state <br /> <br />and local transportation projects, including important street maintenance and public <br /> <br />transit programs; and <br /> <br />14880 <br />MUFF # 501 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.