My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC19-13 0092 PC Reso 1143 Oliver Street
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
Reso PC19-13 0092 PC Reso 1143 Oliver Street
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2019 2:18:34 PM
Creation date
10/21/2019 2:17:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
10/1/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING <br />COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: <br />1. The Planning Commission finds that the above recitals are accurate and <br />constitute findings in this matter, and with the staff reports, the application materials, <br />development plan, and all other documents, reports, oral and written testimony, <br />and materials in the City's file for the application and the Project, and all adopted City <br />planning documents relating to the Project and the property including the City's <br />General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable City laws and <br />regulations, have together served as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis <br />for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution. <br />2. The Planning Commission finds that the project is exempt from the California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to per Section 15301 Class 1(e) <br />(Existing Facilities) and 15303(a) (New Construction or Conversion of Small <br />Structures) as described in the staff report. <br />3. In upholding the Zoning Administrator's decision, the Planning Commission is <br />able make the required findings for approval of an Architectural Permit (Zoning <br />Ordinance Section 45.4). Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that: <br />A. The existence of sufficient variety in the design of the structure and grounds <br />to avoid monotony in the external appearance; <br />The proposed structure utilizes a variety of methods to avoid monotony in the <br />elevations. The design includes stepbacks and architectural features such as <br />belly bands and architectural wood corbels to soften and break up the massing <br />of the two-story structure. <br />B. The size and design of the structure shall be considered for the purpose of <br />determining that the structure is in proportion to its building site and that it has <br />a balance and unity among its external features so as to present a harmonious <br />appearance; <br />The proposed structure meets all applicable development standards for the <br />R-2 zoning district and accessory dwelling unit requirements for massing <br />including setbacks, height, lot coverage and parking. The proposed height of <br />the structure is 22 feet, where 28 feet is allowed. The project is designed to <br />be harmonious and cohesive with the existing development onsite by <br />incorporating similar roof forms and pitches, and matching the existing colors <br />and materials. The project provides adequate building articulation and <br />stepbacks to break up the mass and bulk. <br />C. The extent to which the structure conforms to the general character of other <br />structures in the vicinity insofar as the character can be ascertained and is <br />found to be architecturally desirable; <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />ATTY/RESO.0092/PC RESO 1143 OLIVER STREET <br />REV: 09-27-19 PR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.