Reso PC19-13 0092 PC Reso 1143 Oliver Street

Browse Search

requirement for second story additions in residential zoning, therefore no Architectural Permit finding or zoning district development standard regulates potential shadows or lack of sun exposure onto neighboring properties. C. Privacy - The appellant asserts that the rear stairway and landing would be utilized as a de facto deck and therefore infringe on privacy. Response: The appellant's property and the subject property share an interior side lot line. The stairway and covered landing are parallel to the rear lot line rather than the interior side lot line. This configuration along the rear property line would therefore be less than impactful than along the side property line. No decks or porches are proposed and the stairway landing is not larger than standard landings. Further, the current zoning and accessory dwelling unit requirements do not have specific codified regulations pertaining to privacy. 5. The Planning Commission hereby denies the appeal by Ben Gryn, and, therefore, the decision of the Zoning Administrator approving the Architectural Permit is upheld. 6. In denying the appeal and upholding the Zoning Administrator's decision, the Planning Commission adopts the findings set forth herein, and adopts the conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 7. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption. Page 5 of 8 ATTY/RESO.0092/PC RESO 1143 OLIVER STREET REV: 09-27-19 PR