My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-10-28 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-10-28 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 1:14:56 PM
Creation date
10/25/2019 8:11:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/28/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLK-Pamela Aguilar <br />From: Aimee Bailey <aimeebailey@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2019 11:53 AM <br />To: GRP -City Council <br />Subject: Adoption of Reach Codes - Oct 28 agenda item <br />Dear Redwood City City Council, <br />My name is Aimee Bailey, a homeowner and resident of Redwood City's Centennial Neighborhood since <br />2014. By way of personal background, I'm an energy industry professional with a PhD in physics and over a <br />decade experience in the utility sector in positions at the US Department of Energy, PG&E, Palo Alto Utilities, <br />EDF, and Silicon Valley Clean Energy. I pivoted my career from physics research to energy to address climate <br />change, the greatest existential threat of our time. <br />I'm writing to urge you to go beyond the staff proposal for reach codes and mandate all -electric buildings in <br />new construction for the following reasons: <br />• We must electrify all buildings to run off clean electricity to achieve science -based climate targets. <br />Buildings are >25% of the state's greenhouse gas emissions, and building electrification is the only <br />viable pathway for reducing emissions at scale, based on years of research from universities and national <br />labs. <br />• All -electric new construction costs less than building with gas. There's significant savings when you <br />do not install two separate utility connections (electric and gas). Everyone from affordable housing <br />developers in Silicon Valley to the University of California & Stanford are already building all -electric, <br />because they've researched it and know the benefits. <br />• Any gas infrastructure installed in buildings today is a stranded asset. Requiring all -electric new <br />construction is the fiscally prudent decision. All gas infrastructure will need to be ripped out and <br />replaced with electric in the coming decades. Requiring it now will save our community - residents and <br />businesses - millions if not billions of dollars. <br />• All -electric buildings with solar and battery storage enhance community resiliency. Buildings with <br />gas are not more resilient: modern gas appliances require electricity to operate. All -electric buildings <br />with solar and storage offer greater resiliency benefits for residents and businesses, especially in light of <br />PSPS events. <br />• Advanced electric appliances are not new - they are industry standard in other regions of the US <br />and abroad. Advanced electric technologies using heat pumps for space and water heating (not <br />resistance appliances) and induction stoves for cooking (not coil cooktops) are already tested and <br />proven. These technologies dominate most markets outside California. <br />• PG&E supports all -electric new construction. Here is a copy of their letter of support for all -electric <br />new construction to the City of Morgan Hill, which just passed a gas ban last week. They offered to <br />show up at city council meetings to answer questions and voice support. <br />• Eliminating indoor combustion improves indoor air quality for residents. Buildings with gas in <br />California release more smog indoors than all gas power plants, which impacts the health of our families <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.