Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'Homeowners Protection Act' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />8A <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />The Homeowners Protection Act will provide iron-clad protections for homeowners by <br />prohibiting state and local governments from using eminent domain to secure a home to transfer <br />to a private developer. The measure provides responsible eminent domain reform in response to <br />the U.S. Supreme Court's Keto v. City of New London decision of 2005. <br /> <br />The broad coalition supporting the Homeowners Protection Act includes businesses, labor <br />groups, environmentalists, seniors, homeowners, affordable housing advocates and local <br />government. <br /> <br />"California cities are supporting the Homeowners Protection Act because we feel that <br />homeowners deserve additional protections from eminent domain," explained Chris McKenzie, <br />executive director of the League of California Cities. "This straightforward measure will protect <br />our residents' most prized possession without attempting to sneak in unrelated and dangerous <br />provisions, unlike other faux eminent domain reforms out there." <br /> <br />The League thanks all of the city officials across the state who contributed their personal time to <br />help the coalition gather signatures. <br /> <br />Other 'Eminent Domain Reform' Measure Riddled with Hidden Agendas <br /> <br />There is another so-caned "eminent domain reform" measure that has submitted signatures to <br />qualify for the June 2008 ballot. Called the California Property Owner and Farmland Protection <br />Act (CPOFPA), it is similar to the defeated Proposition 90 of 2006. <br /> <br />Funding for this measure, dubbed the "Hidden Agendas Scheme,. comes from wealthy apartment <br />owners, mobile park owners and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (among others). The <br />groups are using the issue of eminent domain as a Trojan horse, in a deceptive attempt to trick <br />voters into abolishing rent control and other tenant projection laws. <br /> <br />CPOFPA also contains poorly drafted provisions that count stop future water projects, destroy <br />local land use planning and erode environmental protections. <br /> <br />'NLC' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />The three new members join Novato Council Member and Former League of California Cities <br />President Pat Eklund and Los Angeles Council Member Dennis Zine, whose terms on the NLC <br />board are up in Nov. 2008. .. . . <br /> <br />Loveridge was elected as NLC's second vice president. He will become president in 2010. Lowe <br />and Paras-Caracci were elected to the board of directors for two-year terms. <br /> <br />League of California Cities Executive Director Chris McKenzie was enthusiastic about the <br />increased role California can have with NLC and the know-how the California NLC delegation <br />brings to the table. <br /> <br />"Our delegation brings experience handling natural disasters, implementing innovative solutions <br />to address climate change, protecting local revenue, strengthening infrastructure and improving <br />the quality of life for residents of our state," McKenzie said. <br /> <br />League of California Cities President and San Diego Council Member Jim Madaffer agreed, <br />spotlighting Loveridge as an outstanding choice for NLC's second vice president position. <br /> <br />"Ron Loveridge has occupied virtually every leadership position open to a city official and is one <br />of the state's top air quality policy experts," Madaffer explained. "NLC could not have chosen a <br />more qualified individual." <br /> <br />2 <br />