My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-12-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-12-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:50:48 PM
Creation date
12/13/2007 4:29:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/17/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
671
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7C <br /> Page 48 <br /> 2. Require the applicant to conduct additional analysis utiEizing data an the <br /> hydraulic geometry of tidaf marshes to determine fhe effect of a reductian in <br /> ±he Redwood Creek tidal prism on the channel geome#ry (e.g., dep#h, cros�- <br /> sectional area} of Redwood Creek through the project reach. if the <br /> computations indicate loss of effective depths and channel cross-sections, <br /> the applicant shall determine the increased volume and frequency of <br /> dredging required to maintain navigability in Redwood Creek. The applicant <br /> and the City shall then negotiate to determine an equitable fee structure for <br /> project residents to compensate for the additional costs of channel <br /> maintenance, <br /> Findings: Implementation of#he above mitigation rrzeasures would reduce <br /> project impacts on siltation rates and dredging frequencies and costs to a less-than-significant <br /> level. <br /> VII. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVlGES <br /> A. Cumulative Municipal Water Service Demand <br /> Potential lmpact 10-1: The project would increase the demand far r-nunicipal <br /> water service in the project vicinity. Pursuant to State of Califomia Water Cade Section <br /> 10910(g}(1), the City Councif of the City of Redwood Ciiy approved the Water Supply <br /> Assessmen# (WSA}for the Peninsula Park project on �ebruary 26, 2007. The WSA determined <br /> that the City currently has sufficient water, in most years, to meet the projected water demands <br /> of the proposed project together with those of its existing customers and the demands of other <br /> planned develapment. However, pursuant to State SB 221, a subsequent water supply <br /> assessment must be prepared before project approval/disapproval to determine if the approved <br /> WSA is still accurate. Until that determination is made, the anticipated project-related and <br /> cumulative demands for water service would represen# a pofenfially significanf project and <br /> cumulafive impacf. <br /> Mitigation 10-1: As required by State SB 221, prior ta City approval of any <br /> tentative map or development agr�ement for#he proposed prnj�c#, the City's Public Works <br /> Services Department shafi undertake a subsequent water supply analysis, which shali describe <br /> the citywide water supply situation at that future time, reflecting progress on current City studies <br /> and plans for finding opportunities for water transfiers, expanding its recycled water pragram, <br /> and impiementing additianal "best management prac#ices" {BMPs}for water conservation. As <br /> required by SB 221, no tentative map ar developmen#agreemen#shall be approved until a <br /> subsequent water supply anafysis concludes that sufficient water w{II be available to serve the <br /> propased project needs. <br /> The project applicant shal{ also be required tn comply with alf appficable current <br /> and future City water demand performance standards, including standards included in the C� <br /> of Redwoad Citv Urban Wa#er Manaqement Plan, the City's recycled water project, and the <br /> City's water conservation program. <br /> Findings: The City-approved WSA has concluded fhat "the City has sufficient <br /> water, {n most years, to meet the expected future water demands of the project together with <br /> those of existing cus#or-ners and planned future development." Therefore, implementation of this <br /> Mitigation Measure 10-1 pursuant#o SB 221 is feasible and would reduce this impact to a less- <br /> fhan-significant impact. <br /> Atty/Reso/Resa.7 772 27 <br /> 121307 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.