AgdaPkt 2007-12-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7C Page 59 areas shall be irrigated and maintained as necessary to ensure the long-term surviva! of the vegetation. Findings: Implemen#ation of Mitigatian Measure 11-6 is feasible and would reduce this potential impact to a less-fhan-signifrcant level. IX. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY A. Safetv lmpacts Related to San Carlos Airaort � Patential Impact 12-'[: The proposed project wouid introduce new development and approximately� 1,660 fuli-time residents wifhin the restricted height area of the San Carlas Airport planning area. This could represent a potentially significanf impact. Mitigation: In addition to the project review required by C/CAG per PUC sect�on 21670 et seq., the applicant rr�ust submit a Notice of Propased Construction ar Alterafion {FAA Form 7�60-9) to fhe FAA for airspace review. If the propased project structures are deemed to be obstructions to air navigation, specific mitigation measures required by the FAA shall be implemented to ensure that navigation is not obstructed. The Avigation Easement signed by the project applicant and the San Carlos Airport Pilots Association on August 2, 2007 constitutes a "buyer awareness measure" and requires transfer of appropriate disclosure documents to buyers and renters which include an acknowledgment of potential nuisance and safeiy issues assaciated with property ownership and #enancy in proximity to a general aviation facility. The transfer of mandatory disclosure documents would be completed as part of the required California Department of Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement (TDS)given to all prospective buyers and renters. �indings: Irrtplementation of Mitigation Measure 12-1 would reduce safety impacts related to the San Carlos Airport ta a less-fhan-significanf level. X. NOISE AND VIBRATION A. Proiect Compatibilitv with the Exisfina and Proiected Noise Environment Potential tmpac# 't3-1: Project residentia! units located in the tallest s#ructures would be up fa ten staries above ground tevel. Residences on the uppermost s#ories of these s#ructures wauld not be shielded from distant naise sources (e.g., U.S. 101) by intervening buildings ar terrain. Noise levels at the facades of the uppermost residences would be expected to be greater #han 60 dBA CNEL due primarily to fresway and aviation noise. This conditian would therefore represen#a pofenfially significant impact. Mitigation 13-1: Conduct and submit an acoustical study far the praject multifamily residential companent in accordance with State Title 24 requirements. The study report shall identify to the satisfaction of the Ci#y's Building Department noise insulation features and other eEements (e.g., forced-air mechanical ventilation, sound-rated windows) to be includec! in the design of the praject residential structures sufficient to maintain interior noise levels at or below City and S#ate standards (45 Ld�). This report shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Department prior to issuance of a residential building permit. Atty/Reso/Reso.1772 38 1213a7