My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-12-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-12-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:50:48 PM
Creation date
12/13/2007 4:29:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/17/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
671
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M��G����'r's D�SC�ss�o��A��,�s�s <br /> At June 30, 2007, the City's governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $123.4 million, which is a <br /> decrease of$2.1 million from the beginning year balance of$125.5 million. This decrease was primarily due to the <br /> continued spending of the proceeds of bonds the Redevelopment Agency issued in FY 2003/04 in connection with <br /> downtown revitalization efforts, in addition to increased expenditures in the capital outlay fund. <br /> Governmental fund revenues increased $6.3 million this year to $108.2 million. Increases in the general fund, <br /> capital outlay fund, and redevelopment agency fund revenues were offset by decreases in the transportation grants <br /> fund and the grants fund. Expenditures,including capital outlay, decreased$6.7 million this year to $108.9 million. <br /> Most of the decrease was attributable to higher capital outlay expenditures in FY 2005/06 for public underground <br /> parking garage and the courthouse fa�ade renovation, along with a decline in the Shores Transportation <br /> Improvement District capital outlay expenditures as this project nears completion. This decrease was partially <br /> offset in FY 2006/07 by increased capital outlay expenditures for the Courthouse Plaza project along with the <br /> Redwood Shores Library. <br /> The general fund is the primary operating fund of the City. At June 30, 2007, unreserved fund balance of the <br /> general fund was $40.8 million of which $23.9 million is available for subsequent years' expenditures while total <br /> fund balance increased to $45 million from a beginning fund balance of$43.1 million. As a measure of the general <br /> fund's liquidity, it may be useful to compare both unreserved fund balance and total fund balance to total fund <br /> expenditures. Unreserved fund balance represents 58% of total fund expenditures, while total fund balance <br /> represents 64% of that same amount. The City's general fund balance increased by $1.9 million during the current <br /> fiscal year. <br /> The following are the maj or funds that qualified under the reporting criteria for maj or funds selection: <br /> General Fund - General fund revenues increased approximately $5 million this fiscal year primarily due to <br /> increases in property taxes and sales and other taxes. Property taxes increased $2.5 million reflecting the <br /> discontinued state takeaway in which property taxes were shifted from cities and counties to the state during fiscal <br /> years 2004/OS and 2005/06. The elimination of the state takeaway created a property tax increase of$1.5 million. <br /> The remaining increase in property taxes resulted from growth in assessed valuation of 7.54% resulting from <br /> continued development in the City and increased prices for existing residential properties. These increases in <br /> property tax were offset by a decline in the amount of reimbursement from San Mateo County for prior year <br /> payments to the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF). The general fund received $2.6 million from the <br /> county as its share of the ERAF rebate in FY 2006/07, a decline of$800,000. <br /> ERAF, which was created by state law in the early 1990's, allowed the state to shift on an ongoing basis a portion <br /> of each city, county, and special district's property taxes to school districts. This shift allowed the state to decrease <br /> the state's general fund support to schools throughout the state and concomitantly reduced state funding of schools. <br /> Within each county, ERAF revenues are allocated to schools based upon a formula that considers, among several <br /> factors, the average daily attendance and the amount of each school district's own property tax revenue. Within <br /> San Mateo County, the outcome of applying this formula was that the school districts did not require all of the <br /> funds shifted from the cities, county, and special districts. Consequently, these funds were returned to each entity <br /> in proportion to the amount that was initially collected. <br /> General fund revenues also increased due to a$1.3 million combined increase in building permits,plan checking, <br /> and planning services fees related to increased construction activity in the City, such as the planned Costco <br /> expansion, Sequoia Hospital, and Stanford projects. <br /> General fund expenditures increased $3 million as a result of a $639,000 increase in planning expenditures related <br /> to the increased construction activity noted above. Additionally, law enforcement increased $412,000 due to <br /> increased staffing for gang suppression, and parks and recreation increased $455,000 due to enhanced programs <br /> which were offset by increased user fees. Information services increased $406,000 primarily due to increased <br /> expenditures for literacy programs. Also, policy, development, and implementation expenditures increased <br /> $479,000 due to increases in retiree health costs,increases in professional services related to negotiations regarding <br /> the potential use of the Century 12 Theater site as an automall, increases in county property tax administration <br /> costs, and an increase in sales tax audit services(offset by an increase in sales tax revenue). <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.