Laserfiche WebLink
<br />12/17/2007 <br /> <br />H. Parks and Recreation Services Impacts <br /> <br />Potential Impact 10-8: The new residents resulting from the project's 796-unit <br />residential component would increase the demand for local parks and recreational services. <br />The City has not adopted a citywide parks standard; however, in order to maintain the City's <br />current parks ratio of 1.7 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, approximately 2.82 acres of <br />additional improved parkland at a location or locations so as to be available for use by project <br />residents would be required to serve the park needs of the projected 1,660 project residents; <br />currently, no improved parkland exists within a convenient walking distance (e.g., less than 1/2- <br />mile) of the project site. The proposed project includes approximately 2.79 acres of on-site <br />public park area in the form of a community park adjacent to Bair Island Road and two "overlook <br />parks" adjacent to Redwood Creek. Additional on-site public open space would include <br />pedestrian and bicycle paths, promenades, and a proposed link to the planned San Francisco <br />Bay Trail extension (not yet designed). Project effects on City parks and recreation services <br />would represent a potentially significant impact. <br /> <br />Mitigation 10-8: As part of Precise Plan formulation for the project, the City's <br />Community Development Services Department and Parks, Recreation and Community Services <br />Department shall decide what credit would be applied toward meeting the project's parks and <br />recreation needs, based on a total projected need of approximately 2.82 acres of additional <br />improved parkland, through provision of the on-site community park, two "overlook parks," other <br />public open space, and the proposed link to the planned San Francisco Bay Trail extension. If <br />determined necessary by the City, the developer shall revise the project site plan to incorporate <br />on-site parkland with amenities sufficient to serve the project residents, or pay the City-adopted <br />Parks Impact Fee (per City Ordinances 287 and 288) to make-up the difference. <br /> <br />Findings: Implementation of this mitigation measure is feasible and would <br />reduce project impacts on park facilities and recreational programs to a less-than-significant <br />level. <br /> <br />I. Solid Waste Diversion Impacts <br /> <br />Potential Impact 10-9: Due to the 100-to-120-foot height of ten of the project <br />buildings, the project has the potential to conflict with state-mandated requirements for 50 . <br />percent solid waste stream diversion if residents find the locations of recycling bins to be too <br />distant or inconvenient. Site and project plans submitted at this time do not provide enough <br />detail to determine if adequate provisions for recycling have been included in project design. If <br />adequate recycling provisions are not ultimately included, the project could conflict with state- <br />mandated waste stream reduction requirements, representing a potentially significant impact. <br /> <br />Mitigation 10-9: The final project architectural design shall include chutes for <br />recyclable materials immediately adjacent to the garbage chutes, or at another suitable location <br />approved by the City, in the ten tallest residential buildings. Bins for storage of recyclables shall <br />be provided for each residential unit in these buildings. The City shall ensure that these <br />provisions are included in project construction prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. <br /> <br />Findings: Implementation of this measure is feasible and would reduce the <br />impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> <br />Atly/Reso/Reso.1772 <br />121707 <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />14829 <br />Muff# 613 <br />