My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res07 14829
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Res07 14829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2007 8:30:53 AM
Creation date
12/20/2007 8:24:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/17/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />12/17/2007 <br /> <br />· Create a mixed use residential-office-retail project that responds to <br />perceived future market demands for more residential purchase and <br />office lease opportunities in the Mid-Peninsula, convenient to an <br />existing downtown, a major interregional transit corridor, and local job <br />centers; <br /> <br />. Provide primarily residential uses, with complementary commercial, <br />retail, and other community-serving uses; <br /> <br />· Create the project as a high-quality Bayfront development providing a <br />variety of housing options in order to address the Peninsula's housing <br />shortage, which currently prices many city and county employees out <br />of the area; <br /> <br />· Create a community that invites and encourages residents and the general <br />public to enjoy the San Francisco Bay and the Bair Island Wildlife Refuge <br />through new public access and community-serving amenities such as <br />restaurants, offices, retail, community centers, and overlooks; and <br /> <br />· Create a waterfront project that provides access to San Francisco Bay for <br />residents and the public via integrated walkways, internal waterways, and <br />marinas. <br /> <br />Based on the foregoing and the discussion in Section 17.1 of the FEIR, the City finds that, on <br />balance, the Project provides substantially greater public benefits than the No Project <br />Alternative and that the No Project Alternative is not a feasible alternative to the Project. <br /> <br />B. Buildout Under Existina General Plan And Zonina - Maximum Residential <br />Plus Commercial (Alternative 2) <br /> <br />Description: Alternative 2 assumes that the Initial Project site would be <br />developed with the maximum number of residential units permissible under existing General <br />Plan and zoning provisions for the site. Under Alternative 2, the Pete's Harbor portion of the <br />site would be developed exclusively with residential uses at the maximum allowable residential <br />density of 40 dwelling units per net acre, for a total of 462 residential units. The Peninsula <br />Marina portion of the site would be developed with office and general retail uses only for a total <br />of approximately 898,000 square feet of commercial floor area, including approximately 20,000 <br />square feet of retail-restaurant floor area and 878,000 square feet of office floor area. <br /> <br />Findings: Alternative 2 would substantially reduce the environmental impacts of <br />the Initial Project in the areas of land use, visual factors, biological resources, infrastructure and <br />public services, soils and geology, public health and safety, noise, and cultural and historic <br />resources. In all of these areas, however, Alternative 2 would still have significant <br />environmental impacts requiring mitigation. In the area of transportation and circulation, the <br />environmental impacts of Alternative 2 would actually be slightly increased over those of the <br />proposed Project. Impacts in the areas of hydrology and water quality and air quality would be <br />similar to those associated with the Initial Project. With respect to population, housing and <br />employment, Alternative 2 would contribute substantially to the existing citywide imbalance <br />between residents and jobs, resulting in increased in-commuting. Alternative 2, which would <br />produce 76 percent fewer residential units than the Initial Project, would not attain the Project <br /> <br />Atty/Reso/Reso.1772 <br />121707 <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />14829 <br />Muff# 613 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.