My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-11-25 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-11-25 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 9:24:15 AM
Creation date
11/21/2019 4:36:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/25/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.B. -Page 11 of 15 <br />City of Redwood City <br />2019 Public Health Goal Report <br />Why Lead is Regulated? <br />In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act. This law requires the EPA to <br />determine safe levels of chemicals in drinking water which do, or may cause, health <br />problems. These are non -enforceable levels based solely on possible health risks and <br />exposure. <br />In 1995 the State of California adopted an Action Level of 15 ppb for lead, and requires the <br />lead concentration in 90 percent of the water samples collected at customer taps not to <br />exceed the Action Level. <br />The California OEHHA revised the PHG for lead in drinking water from 2 ppb to 0.2 ppb on <br />April 24, 2009, based on new studies relating to the most sensitive health risks. <br />Since lead contamination generally occurs from corrosion of household lead pipes, it cannot <br />be directly detected or removed by Redwood City. Instead, EPA requires water systems to <br />control the corrosiveness of their water if the level of lead at home taps exceeds the Action <br />Level. The AL for lead has been set at 15 ppb because the EPA believes, given present <br />technology and resources, this is the lowest level to which water systems can reasonably be <br />required to control the contaminant should it occur in drinking water at their customers <br />home taps. <br />Health Risks <br />Lead has multiple toxic effects on human body. The OEHHA revised the PHG for lead in <br />drinking water based on new studies relating to the most sensitive health risks. These are <br />non -carcinogenic, chronic health effects including neurobehavioral effects (decreased <br />intelligence) in children and hypertension in adults. Lead also has the potential to cause <br />kidney disease and cancer; however, the carcinogenic risks are considered smaller than the <br />risks for chronic toxicity. The public health goal of 0.2 ppb was determined from a maximum <br />daily lead intake through water ingestion of 2.86 Itg/day, which corresponds to a level of <br />concern for neurobehavioral effects (in children) designated as a decrease of one <br />Intelligence Quotient point. <br />Best Available Technology for Lead Elimination <br />DDW considers optimizing corrosion controls as the BAT to deal with lead in drinking water. <br />In an evaluation report dated August 4, 2006, the SFPUC concluded that pH adjustment in <br />the San Francisco Regional Water System, which supplies water to Redwood City, is the <br />optimal corrosion control treatment. The report, which was then approved by the DDW, <br />recommends a minimum pH of 8.2 (i.e. the optimal water quality parameter, or OWQP) be <br />maintained throughout the transmission and distribution system. Because Redwood City <br />continues to meet the Action Level for lead and operate the water system with pH greater <br />than 8.2, DDW considers that the City has achieved optimized corrosion control. Therefore, <br />additional corrosion control treatment is not needed. <br />5 <br />324 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.