Laserfiche WebLink
7.B. -Page 11 of 15 <br />City of Redwood City <br />2019 Public Health Goal Report <br />Why Lead is Regulated? <br />In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act. This law requires the EPA to <br />determine safe levels of chemicals in drinking water which do, or may cause, health <br />problems. These are non -enforceable levels based solely on possible health risks and <br />exposure. <br />In 1995 the State of California adopted an Action Level of 15 ppb for lead, and requires the <br />lead concentration in 90 percent of the water samples collected at customer taps not to <br />exceed the Action Level. <br />The California OEHHA revised the PHG for lead in drinking water from 2 ppb to 0.2 ppb on <br />April 24, 2009, based on new studies relating to the most sensitive health risks. <br />Since lead contamination generally occurs from corrosion of household lead pipes, it cannot <br />be directly detected or removed by Redwood City. Instead, EPA requires water systems to <br />control the corrosiveness of their water if the level of lead at home taps exceeds the Action <br />Level. The AL for lead has been set at 15 ppb because the EPA believes, given present <br />technology and resources, this is the lowest level to which water systems can reasonably be <br />required to control the contaminant should it occur in drinking water at their customers <br />home taps. <br />Health Risks <br />Lead has multiple toxic effects on human body. The OEHHA revised the PHG for lead in <br />drinking water based on new studies relating to the most sensitive health risks. These are <br />non -carcinogenic, chronic health effects including neurobehavioral effects (decreased <br />intelligence) in children and hypertension in adults. Lead also has the potential to cause <br />kidney disease and cancer; however, the carcinogenic risks are considered smaller than the <br />risks for chronic toxicity. The public health goal of 0.2 ppb was determined from a maximum <br />daily lead intake through water ingestion of 2.86 Itg/day, which corresponds to a level of <br />concern for neurobehavioral effects (in children) designated as a decrease of one <br />Intelligence Quotient point. <br />Best Available Technology for Lead Elimination <br />DDW considers optimizing corrosion controls as the BAT to deal with lead in drinking water. <br />In an evaluation report dated August 4, 2006, the SFPUC concluded that pH adjustment in <br />the San Francisco Regional Water System, which supplies water to Redwood City, is the <br />optimal corrosion control treatment. The report, which was then approved by the DDW, <br />recommends a minimum pH of 8.2 (i.e. the optimal water quality parameter, or OWQP) be <br />maintained throughout the transmission and distribution system. Because Redwood City <br />continues to meet the Action Level for lead and operate the water system with pH greater <br />than 8.2, DDW considers that the City has achieved optimized corrosion control. Therefore, <br />additional corrosion control treatment is not needed. <br />5 <br />324 <br />