Laserfiche WebLink
6.A. - Page 116 of 191 <br />CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br />NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS <br />For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019 <br />NOTE 14 — DISSOLUTION OF THE REDWOOD CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />As part of the FY 2011-12 State Budget package, and in an effort to help solve the State's budget problems, <br />the California legislature enacted and the Governor signed two companion bills addressing redevelopment, <br />AB X1 26 (Dissolution Act) and AB X1 27 (Voluntary Program Act), which took effect on June 29, 2011. <br />The Dissolution Act immediately suspended all new redevelopment activities and incurrence of <br />indebtedness, and eliminated redevelopment agencies as of October 1, 2011. <br />The Voluntary Program Act allows the community that created the redevelopment agency to avoid <br />dissolution by opting to pay a substantial community remittance beginning FY 2011-12 and each year <br />thereafter. <br />On July 18, 2011, the California Redevelopment Association, the League of California Cities, and others <br />filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Supreme Court of the State of California (California <br />Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al., Case No. 5194861), challenging the <br />constitutionality of the companion bills, the Dissolution Act, and the Voluntary Program Act, on behalf of <br />cities, counties, and redevelopment agencies, and requesting a stay of their enforcement. <br />On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court upheld the Dissolution Act and found the Voluntary <br />Program Act to be unconstitutional and extended the date of dissolution to February 1, 2012. <br />The Dissolution Act provides that upon dissolution of a redevelopment agency, either the city or another unit <br />of local government will agree to serve as the "Successor Agency" to hold the assets until they are <br />distributed to other units of state and local government. The City Council elected to become Successor <br />Agency on August 22, 2011 with resolution 15141, and reconfirmed this action on January 23, 2012 with <br />resolution 15164. <br />Under the Dissolution Act, redevelopment agencies in the State of California cannot enter into new projects, <br />obligations, or commitments. Subject to the control of a newly established oversight board, remaining assets <br />can only be used to pay enforceable obligations in existence at the date of dissolution (including the <br />completion of any unfinished projects that were subject to legally enforceable contractual commitments). <br />In FY 2010-11, prior to AB X1 26 becoming law, $3.3 million of real property assets (vacant land) were <br />transferred from the RDA's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to the City in an attempt to protect <br />these assets from being diverted for the benefit of the State. AB X1 26, however, specifically disallowed <br />such transfers. Accordingly, the assets were transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset <br />Fund in FY 2011-12. <br />88 123 <br />