My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:17:00 PM
Creation date
12/13/2019 1:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/16/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Modified:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Text:
http://www.redwoodcity.org/
ID:
2
Creator:
Created:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Modified:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Text:
https://meetings.redwoodcity.org/AgendaOnline/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=2022&doctype=1
ID:
3
Creator:
Created:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Modified:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Text:
https://www.redwoodcity.org/home/showdocument?id=18324
ID:
4
Creator:
Created:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Modified:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Text:
https://meetings.redwoodcity.org/AgendaOnline/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=2060&doctype=1
ID:
5
Creator:
Created:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Modified:
12/13/2019 1:44 PM
Text:
https://meetings.redwoodcity.org/AgendaOnline/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=2062&doctype=1
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
866
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.D. - Page 3 of 126 <br />After obtaining public input on the matter, the Council recommended option 2 and included it as a short- <br />term implementation item to be processed after Plan adoption. The above public input and Council <br />direction framed the proposal that staff has prepared, which is to maintain the existing MULW districts, <br />heights and densities, but to expand uses (including standalone residential housing) and incorporate a <br />community benefits program. <br />Drafting the MULW zoning amendments were delayed due to staffing and workload challenges, including <br />new single-family residential policy changes that became a City priority in the last 18 months. <br />Environmental analysis of the proposed amendments also added additional time and cost to the process. <br />On June 4, 2019, staff presented the draft MULW amendments at the Planning Commission hearing. The <br />Commission supported allowing housing but raised questions and concerns and recommended a study <br />session before a formal recommendation could be considered. Key questions and concerns included: <br />1. Consider whether to maintain MULW or re -envision the zoning district <br />2. Provide more public engagement opportunities for those affected by the changes <br />3. Address displacement concerns <br />4. Consider how to promote housing <br />S. Better define mixed-use developments <br />6. Consider whether live/work units are still desirable <br />On October 1, 2019, the Planning Commission held a study session on the matter and provided direction <br />on the key elements above, questions raised by staff, and concerns raised by the public. The Planning <br />Commission generally supported the MULW amendments and suggested that potentially further <br />amendments could be considered when the City processes the second phase of the Mixed -Use <br />amendments, which will be a larger scale, more comprehensive effort. The second phase of the Mixed - <br />Use Amendments is targeted to begin in summer of 2020 and be a two-year process. The Commission <br />recognized the need for minor fixes to this district in the short term, which could help facilitate <br />development projects that support community needs and interest. <br />On November 5, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the revised <br />amendments. Based on feedback from the study session and public, staff provided a small and large <br />project point systems for the Community Benefits Program and added two new categories; (1) housing, <br />and (2) active uses. Also in response to comments received, staff maintained the existing FAR at 2.0 rather <br />than lowering it for development without community benefits. The Commission indicated that the <br />revisions adequately addressed their and the public's comments and supported the draft as revised. In <br />addition, written and public testimony supported the revisions as drafted. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The proposed amendments to the MULW and MULW-S zoning districts are designed to increase flexibility <br />in land uses, promote live/work units, improve the jobs/housing balance, and simplify the zoning. The <br />amendments would also incorporate the community benefit bonus provisions, consistent with the other <br />mixed-use zoning districts, which allows additional height or intensity in exchange for community <br />benefits. <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore <br />604 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.