My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:17:00 PM
Creation date
12/13/2019 1:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/16/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
866
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.D. - Page 42 of 126 <br />City of Redwood City <br />Mixed -Use Live/Work and Emergency Shelter Zoning Amendment Project <br />Impact 4.4-6: Development allowed by the General Plan could Less than <br />result in the potential spread of invasive weeds in the hillsides, significant with <br />creekside and waterfront areas. Mitigation <br />Cultural Resources <br />Impact 4.5-1: Growth projected to occur with new allowable Less than <br />development under the General Plan could cause a substantial significant <br />adverse change in the significance of historical resources in the <br />plan area due to damage or demolition of historic resources. <br />mitigation measures would continue to apply to projects in the <br />MULW zone. <br />Adherence to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and <br />continued implementation of applicable General Plan policies <br />and programs regarding heritage trees and special status species, <br />and avian or bat species (including General Plan programs NR -22, <br />NR -23, and NR -2) would reduce potential impacts associated <br />with development under the proposed project to a less than <br />significant level. <br />The project site is not in a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural <br />Community Conservation Plan area. There would be no impact <br />from of the proposed project. <br />The General Plan includes policies and programs to preserve <br />both publicly and privately -owned historic and cultural <br />resources. These policies and implementation programs <br />encourage identification, evaluation, and listing of historical <br />resources in local, state, and federal registers, including <br />individual resources and districts. The proposed project would <br />comply with these policies, and would not involve specific <br />development activity. Subsequent projects would require <br />additional site-specific analyses for potential adverse changes to <br />historic resources. <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />proposed project would <br />result in less than significant <br />impacts to historic <br />resources. No new or more <br />severe impacts would <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />within the scope of those <br />identified in the General <br />Plan EIR. <br />Impact 4.5-2: Construction activities, including site preparation Less than <br />The proposed project would not involve specific development <br />The proposed project would <br />and grading, associated with new development allowed under significant with <br />activity. No new or substantially more severe significant impacts <br />result in less than significant <br />the General Plan could adversely impact previously mitigation <br />would occur with project implementation than were identified in <br />impacts to undiscovered <br />undiscovered archaeological resources due to uncovering or <br />the previously certified Final EIR. <br />archaeological resources. <br />unearthing these resources. <br />The General Plan includes mitigation measures that require as a <br />No new or more severe <br />standard condition of approval on all ground disturbing activities <br />impacts would occur. <br />in the City's jurisdiction adoption of a resolution to stop work in <br />Impacts would be within <br />the event sensitive cultural resources are identified; and <br />the scope of those <br />confirmation that the applicant has required all construction <br />identified in the General <br />crew members undergo adequate training related to <br />Plan EIR. <br />identification of cultural resources. Under the proposed project, <br />this mitigation measure would continue to apply to projects in <br />the MULW zone. <br />26 <br />643 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.