Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 61 of 285 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />water heater provides consistency in performance across all the equipment upgrade cases, even though hot <br />water draws differ across the prototypes. <br />2.3 Package Development <br />Three to four packages were evaluated for each prototype and climate zone, as described below. <br />1) Efficiency — Non -Preempted: This package uses only efficiency measures that don't trigger federal <br />preemption issues including envelope, and water heating and duct distribution efficiency measures. <br />2) Efficiency — Equipment, Preempted: This package shows an alternative design that applies HVAC and <br />water heating equipment that are more efficient than federal standards. The Reach Code Team <br />considers this more reflective of how builders meet above code requirements in practice. <br />3) Efficiency & PV: Using the Efficiency — Non -Preempted Package as a starting point', PV capacity is added <br />to offset most of the estimated electricity use. This only applies to the all -electric case, since for the <br />mixed fuel cases, 100% of the projected electricity use is already being offset as required by 2019 Title <br />24, Part 6. <br />4) Efficiency & PV/Battery: Using the Efficiency & PV Package as a starting point, PV capacity is added as <br />well as a battery system. <br />2.3.1 Solar Photovoltaics (PV) <br />Installation of on-site PV is required in the 2019 residential code. The PV sizing methodology in each package <br />was developed to offset annual building electricity use and avoid oversizing which would violate net energy <br />metering (NEM) rules.' In all cases, PV is evaluated in CBECC-Res according to the California Flexible Installation <br />(CFI) assumptions. <br />The Reach Code Team used two options within the CBECC-Res software for sizing the PV system, described <br />below. Analysis was conducted to determine the most appropriate sizing method for each package which is <br />described in the results. <br />• Standard Design PV —the same PV capacity as is required for the Standard Design case10 <br />• Specify PV System Scaling — a PV system sized to offset a specified percentage of the estimated <br />electricity use of the Proposed Design case <br />2.3.2 EnergyStorage torage (Batteries) <br />A battery system was evaluated in CBECC-Res with control type set to "Time of Use" and with default <br />efficiencies of 95% for both charging and discharging. The "Time of Use" option assumes batteries are charged <br />anytime PV generation is greater than the house load but controls when the battery storage system discharges. <br />During the summer months (July — September) the battery begins to discharge at the beginning of the peak <br />period at a maximum rate until fully discharged. During discharge the battery first serves the house load but will <br />' In cases where there was no cost-effective Efficiency— Non -Preempted Package, the most cost-effective <br />efficiency measures for that climate zone were also included in the Efficiency & PV Package in order to provide a <br />combination of both efficiency and PV beyond code minimum. <br />9 NEM rules apply to the IOU territories only. <br />"The Standard Design PV system is sized to offset the electricity use of the building loads which are typically <br />electric in a mixed fuel home, which includes all loads except space heating, water heating, clothes drying, and <br />cooking. <br />H1. <br />2019-08-01 <br />313 <br />