Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 133 of 285 <br />Climate Zone 1 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />Table 47: Single Family Climate Zone 1 Results Summary <br />Climate Zone 1 <br />CO2 -Equivalent <br />NPV of <br />Benefit to Cost <br />PG&E <br />Annual <br />PV Size <br />Emissions (Ibs/sf) <br />Lifetime <br />Ratio B/C <br />Net <br />Annual <br />EDR <br />Change <br />Incremental <br />Single Family <br />kWh <br />therms <br />Mar in4 <br />(kW)5 <br />Total <br />Reduction <br />Cost $ <br />On -Bill <br />TDV <br />Code Compliant <br />(0) <br />581 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />3.00 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />_ <br />CD <br />UL <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />(0) <br />480 <br />5.0 <br />(0.08) <br />2.51 <br />0.49 <br />$1,355 <br />3.38 <br />2.82 <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />0 <br />440 <br />6.5 <br />(0.07) <br />2.32 <br />0.68 <br />$1,280 <br />4.92 <br />4.10 <br />X <br />FEfficiency & PV/Battery <br />(28) <br />480 <br />10.5 <br />0.04 <br />2.40 <br />0.60 <br />$5,311 <br />0.87 <br />1.61 <br />Code Compliant <br />7,079 <br />0 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />1.51 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />2 <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />4,461 <br />0 <br />15.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.01 <br />0.50 <br />$7,642 <br />1.79 <br />1.66 <br />L <br />d <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />5,933 <br />0 <br />6.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.29 <br />0.22 <br />$2,108 <br />2.94 <br />2.74 <br />LU <br />= <br />Efficiency & PV <br />889 <br />0 <br />31.0 <br />2.67 <br />0.52 <br />1.00 <br />$18,192 <br />1.81 <br />1.45 <br />Q <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(14) <br />0 <br />41.0 <br />3.45 <br />0.28 <br />1.23 <br />$24,770 <br />1.45 <br />1.40 <br />o" <br />Code Compliant <br />7,079 <br />0 <br />0.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.51 <br />1.49 <br />($5,349) <br />0.37 <br />0.91 <br />2 <br />_ <br />d <br />Efficiency & PV <br />889 <br />0 <br />31.0 <br />2.67 <br />0.52 <br />2.48 <br />$12,844 <br />1.43 <br />2.11 <br />LL <br />d w <br />Neutral Cost <br />5,270 <br />0 <br />8.0 <br />1.35 <br />1.26 <br />1.74 <br />$0 <br />0.00 <br />1.09 <br />X= <br />9 a <br />Min Cost Effectiveness <br />3,106 <br />0 <br />18.0 <br />2.97 <br />0.95 <br />2.04 <br />($6,372) <br />1.08 <br />>1 <br />'All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home. <br />2All reductions and incremental costs relative to the all -electric code compliant home. <br />3AI1 reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home except the EDR Margins are relative to the Standard Design for each case <br />which is the all -electric code compliant home. Incremental costs for these packages reflect the cots used in the On -Bill cost effectiveness methodology. Costs <br />differ for the TDV methodology due to differences in the site gas infrastructure costs (see Section 2.6). <br />4This represents the Efficiency EDR Margin for the Efficiency -Non -Preempted and Efficiency -Equipment packages and Total EDR Margin for the Efficiency & PV, <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery, Neutral Cost, and Min Cost Effectiveness packages. <br />5Positive values indicate an increase in PV capacity relative to the Standard Design. <br />:O <br />2019-08-01 <br />385 <br />