My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 136 of 285 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />Table 50: Multifamily Climate Zone 2 Results Summary (Per Dwelling Unit) <br />Climate Zone 2 <br />CO2 -Equivalent <br />NPV of <br />Benefit to Cost <br />PG&E <br />Annual <br />PV Size <br />Emissions (lbs/sf) <br />Lifetime <br />Ratio (B/C) <br />Net <br />Annual <br />EDR <br />Change <br />Incremental <br />Total <br />Reduction <br />On <br />TDV <br />Multifamily <br />kWh <br />therms <br />Margin 4 <br />(kW)5 <br />Cost ($) <br />-Bill <br />Code Compliant <br />(0) <br />150 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />2.37 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />_ <br />Q <br />Ui <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />0 <br />142 <br />1.5 <br />(0.02) <br />2.25 <br />0.12 <br />$309 <br />0.97 <br />1.75 <br />X <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />(0) <br />134 <br />2.0 <br />(0.01) <br />2.15 <br />0.22 <br />$497 <br />1.08 <br />1.49 <br />FEfficiency & PV/Battery <br />(11) <br />142 <br />10.5 <br />0.04 <br />2,077 <br />0.30 <br />$2,413 <br />0.17 <br />1.60 <br />Code Compliant <br />2,151 <br />0 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />1.38 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />2,038 <br />0 <br />1.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.32 <br />0.06 <br />$361 <br />1.73 <br />2.05 <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />1,928 <br />0 <br />3.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.25 <br />0.13 <br />$795 <br />1.56 <br />1.56 <br />_d <br />LU <br />= <br />Efficiency & PV <br />476 <br />0 <br />17.5 <br />1.00 <br />0.72 <br />0.67 <br />$3,711 <br />2.42 <br />1.82 <br />Q <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(7) <br />0 <br />30.5 <br />1.36 <br />0.35 <br />1.04 <br />$6,833 <br />1.38 <br />1.74 <br />0 <br />Code Compliant <br />2,151 <br />0 <br />0.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.38 <br />0.99 <br />($2,337) <br />0.53 <br />1.42 <br />d 'L <br />LL <br />Efficiency & PV <br />60 <br />0 <br />17.5 <br />1.00 <br />0.72 <br />1.65 <br />$1,375 <br />3.31 <br />>1 <br />LU <br />K Q <br />Neutral Cost <br />1,063 <br />0 <br />10.5 <br />0.70 <br />0.96 <br />1.41 <br />$0 <br />>1 <br />>1 <br />'All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home. <br />2All reductions and incremental costs relative to the all -electric code compliant home. <br />3All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home except the EDR Margins are relative to the Standard Design for each case <br />which is the all -electric code compliant home. Incremental costs for these packages reflect the cots used in the On -Bill cost effectiveness methodology. Costs <br />differ for the TDV methodology due to differences in the site gas infrastructure costs (see Section 2.6). <br />4This represents the Efficiency EDR Margin for the Efficiency -Non -Preempted and Efficiency -Equipment packages and Total EDR Margin for the Efficiency & <br />PV, Efficiency & PV/Battery, and Neutral Cost packages. <br />5Positive values indicate an increase in PV capacity relative to the Standard Design. <br />WX <br />2019-08-01 <br />388 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.