My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 139 of 285 <br />Climate Zone 4 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />Table 53: Single Family Climate Zone 4 Results Summary <br />Climate Zone 4 <br />CO2 -Equivalent <br />NPV of <br />Benefit to Cost <br />PG&E <br />Annual <br />PV Size <br />Emissions (Ibs/sf) <br />Lifetime <br />Ratio (B/C) <br />Net <br />Annual <br />EDR <br />Change <br />Incremental <br />Single Family <br />kWh <br />therms <br />Mar in4 <br />(kW)5 <br />Total <br />Reduction <br />Cost $ <br />On -Bill <br />TDV <br />Code Compliant <br />0 <br />347 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />1.88 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />UL <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />0 <br />306 <br />2.5 <br />(0.03) <br />1.68 <br />0.20 <br />$1,556 <br />0.93 <br />1.15 <br />x <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />(0) <br />294 <br />2.5 <br />(0.02) <br />1.62 <br />0.26 <br />$758 <br />2.39 <br />2.67 <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(18) <br />306 <br />10.0 <br />0.07 <br />1.55 <br />0.33 <br />$5,434 <br />0.30 <br />1.48 <br />Code Compliant <br />4,342 <br />0 <br />n/an/a <br />1.00 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />3,775 <br />0 <br />3.0 <br />0.00 <br />0.89 <br />0.11 <br />$1,519 <br />1.92 <br />1.84 <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />3,747 <br />0 <br />3.5 <br />0.00 <br />0.88 <br />0.12 <br />$2,108 <br />1.52 <br />1.52 <br />LY <br />= <br />Efficiency & PV <br />814 <br />0 <br />17.0 <br />1.84 <br />0.48 <br />0.52 <br />$8,786 <br />2.13 <br />1.62 <br />a <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(11) <br />0 <br />28.5 <br />2.44 <br />0.25 <br />0.75 <br />I $14,664 <br />1.46 <br />1.61 <br />o 2 <br />Code Compliant <br />4,342 <br />0 <br />0.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.00 <br />0.88 <br />($5,349) <br />0.55 <br />1.59 <br />5 L <br />UL d <br />Efficiency & PV <br />814 <br />0 <br />17.0 <br />1.84 <br />0.48 <br />1.40 <br />$3,438 <br />2.64 <br />>1 <br />�w <br />x Q <br />Neutral Cost <br />2,166 <br />0 <br />10.0 <br />1.35 <br />0.70 <br />1.18 <br />$0 <br />>1 <br />>1 <br />'All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home. <br />2All reductions and incremental costs relative to the all -electric code compliant home. <br />3AI1 reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home except the EDR Margins are relative to the Standard Design for each <br />case which is the all -electric code compliant home. Incremental costs for these packages reflect the cots used in the On -Bill cost effectiveness methodology. <br />Costs differ for the TDV methodology due to differences in the site gas infrastructure costs (see Section 2.6). <br />4This represents the Efficiency EDR Margin for the Efficiency -Non -Preempted and Efficiency -Equipment packages and Total EDR Margin for the Efficiency & <br />PV, Efficiency & PV/Battery, and Neutral Cost packages. <br />5Positive values indicate an increase in PV capacity relative to the Standard Design. <br />M. <br />2019-08-01 <br />391 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.