My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 142 of 285 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />Table 56: Multifamily Climate Zone 5 PG&E Results Summary (Per Dwelling Unit) <br />Climate Zone 5 <br />CO2 -Equivalent <br />NPV of <br />Benefit to Cost <br />PG&E <br />Annual <br />PV Size <br />Emissions (lbs/sf) <br />Lifetime <br />Ratio (B/C) <br />Net <br />Annual <br />EDR <br />Change <br />Incremental <br />-F <br />Multifamily <br />kWh <br />therms <br />Margin <br />(kW)5 <br />Total <br />Reduction <br />Cost $ <br />On -Bill <br />TDV <br />Code Compliant <br />0 <br />131 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />2.10 <br />n/a <br />I n/a 7 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />d <br />UL <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />(0) <br />126 <br />0.5 <br />(0.00) <br />2.03 <br />0.07 <br />I $180 <br />0.99 <br />1.03 <br />x <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />(0) <br />117 <br />1.5 <br />(0.00) <br />1.9 2 <br />0.19 <br />$358 <br />1.24 <br />1.34 <br />4'�__ <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(7) <br />126 <br />9.5 <br />0.05 <br />1.84 <br />0.26 <br />$2,273 <br />0.15 <br />1.38 <br />Code Compliant <br />2,044 <br />0 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />1.32 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />1,990 <br />0 <br />0.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.30 <br />0.03 <br />$247 <br />1.09 <br />0.86 <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />1,738 <br />0 <br />3.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.15 <br />0.17 <br />$795 <br />2.15 <br />2.03 <br />LU <br />Q <br />& PV <br />465 <br />017.0 <br />0.91 <br />0.70 <br />0.62 <br />$3,293 <br />2.53 <br />1.82 <br />[Efficiency <br />fficiency & PV/Battery <br />(6) <br />0 <br />30.0 <br />1.24 <br />0.34 <br />0.98 <br />$6,314 <br />1.44 <br />1.69 <br />2 <br />Code Compliant <br />2,044 <br />0 <br />0.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.32 <br />0.78 <br />($2,337) <br />0.50 <br />1.28 <br />U_T <br />d <br />Efficiency & PV <br />58 <br />0 <br />17.0 <br />0.91 <br />0.70 <br />1.40 <br />$956 <br />3.80 <br />>1 <br />�w <br />LX Q <br />Neutral Cost <br />874 <br />0 <br />12.5 <br />0.70 <br />0.87 <br />1.23 <br />$0 <br />>1 <br />23.44 <br />'All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home. <br />2All reductions and incremental costs relative to the all -electric code compliant home. <br />3All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home except the EDR Margins are relative to the Standard Design for each case <br />which is the all -electric code compliant home. Incremental costs for these packages reflect the cots used in the On -Bill cost effectiveness methodology. Costs <br />differ for the TDV methodology due to differences in the site gas infrastructure costs (see Section 2.6). <br />4This represents the Efficiency EDR Margin for the Efficiency -Non -Preempted and Efficiency -Equipment packages and Total EDR Margin for the Efficiency & <br />PV, Efficiency & PV/Battery, and Neutral Cost packages. <br />5Positive values indicate an increase in PV capacity relative to the Standard Design. <br />FIR <br />2019-08-01 <br />394 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.