My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 158 of 285 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />Table 72: Multifamily Climate Zone 11 Results Summary (Per Dwelling Unit) <br />Climate Zone 11 <br />CO2 -Equivalent <br />NPV of <br />Benefit to Cost <br />PG&E <br />Annual <br />PV Size <br />Emissions (lbs/sf) <br />Lifetime <br />Ratio (B/C) <br />Net <br />Annual <br />EDR <br />Change <br />Incremental <br />Multifamily <br />kWh <br />therms <br />Margin 4 <br />(kW)5 <br />Total <br />Reduction <br />Cost ($) <br />On -Bill <br />TDV <br />Code Compliant <br />(0) <br />141 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />2.38 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />_ <br />Q <br />Li <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />0 <br />127 <br />2.5 <br />(0.05) <br />2.18 <br />0.20 <br />$850 <br />0.65 <br />1.17 <br />X <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />(0) <br />126 <br />3.0 <br />(0.06) <br />2.16 <br />0.22 <br />$317 <br />1.84 <br />3.29 <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(9) <br />127 <br />10.5 <br />0.01 <br />F--2.0070.38 <br />$2,950 <br />0.39 <br />1.60 <br />Code Compliant <br />1,974 <br />0 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />1.42 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />1,732 <br />0 <br />3.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.29 <br />0.13 <br />$1,011 <br />1.40 <br />1.64 <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />1,707 <br />0 <br />3.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.26 <br />0.16 <br />$795 <br />2.02 <br />2.33 <br />_d <br />LU <br />= <br />Efficiency & PV <br />504 <br />0 <br />13.0 <br />0.77 <br />0.81 <br />0.61 <br />$3,601 <br />2.22 <br />1.81 <br />Q <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(6) <br />0 <br />25.0 <br />1.14 <br />0.45 <br />0.98 <br />$6,759 <br />1.42 <br />1.81 <br />2 <br />Code Compliant <br />1,974 <br />0 <br />0.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.42 <br />0.96 <br />($2,337) <br />0.56 <br />1.33 <br />d 'L <br />LL <br />Efficiency & PV <br />63 <br />0 <br />13.0 <br />0.77 <br />0.81 <br />1.56 <br />$1,264 <br />3.03 <br />>1 <br />LU <br />x Q <br />Neutral Cost <br />866 <br />0 <br />9.0 <br />0.70 <br />0.99 <br />1.38 <br />$0 <br />>1 <br />73.96 <br />'All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home. <br />2All reductions and incremental costs relative to the all -electric code compliant home. <br />3All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home except the EDR Margins are relative to the Standard Design for each case <br />which is the all -electric code compliant home. Incremental costs for these packages reflect the cots used in the On -Bill cost effectiveness methodology. Costs <br />differ for the TDV methodology due to differences in the site gas infrastructure costs (see Section 2.6). <br />4This represents the Efficiency EDR Margin for the Efficiency -Non -Preempted and Efficiency -Equipment packages and Total EDR Margin for the Efficiency & <br />PV, Efficiency & PV/Battery, and Neutral Cost packages. <br />5Positive values indicate an increase in PV capacity relative to the Standard Design. <br />105 <br />RE <br />2019-08-01 <br />410 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.