Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 163 of 285 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />Climate Zone 14 SCE/SoCalGas <br />Table 77: Single Family Climate Zone 14 SCE/SoCalGas Results Summary <br />Climate Zone 14 <br />CO2 -Equivalent <br />NPV of <br />Benefit to Cost <br />SCE/SoCalGas <br />Annual <br />PV Size <br />Emissions (Ibs/sf) <br />Lifetime <br />Ratio B/C <br />Net <br />Annual <br />EDR <br />Change <br />Incremental <br />Single FamilykWh <br />therms <br />Margin 4 <br />(kW <br />Total <br />Reduction <br />Cost ($) <br />On -Bill <br />TDV <br />Code Compliant <br />(0) <br />371 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />2.35 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />d <br />U. <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />(0) <br />319 <br />4.5 <br />(0.17) <br />I 2.06 <br />0.29 <br />$1,662 <br />1.57 <br />2.46 <br />4) <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />(0) <br />305 <br />5.5 <br />(0.19) <br />I 1.98 <br />0.36 <br />$799 <br />3.95 <br />6.14 <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(5) <br />319 <br />9.0 <br />(0.08) <br />I 1.83 <br />0.52 <br />$5,526 <br />1.31 <br />1.74 <br />Code Compliant <br />4,725 <br />0 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />1.38 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />3,819 <br />0 <br />5.5 <br />0.00 <br />I 1.19 <br />0.19 <br />$4,154 <br />0.95 <br />1.46 <br />d <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />3,676 <br />0 <br />6.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.16 <br />0.22 <br />$2,108 <br />2.29 <br />3.13 <br />LU <br />s <br />Efficiency & PV <br />95315.5 <br />1.60 <br />0.93 <br />0.45 <br />$10,459 <br />1.21 <br />1.62 <br />Q <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(2) <br />:::o <br />23.5 <br />2.21 <br />0.63 <br />0.75 <br />$16,394 <br />1.35 <br />1.59 <br />o" <br />Code Compliant <br />4,725 <br />0 <br />0.0 <br />0.00 <br />1.38P1.42 <br />($5,349) <br />0.72 <br />1.67 I <br />0dw <br />Efficiency & PV <br />953 <br />0 <br />15.5 <br />1.60 <br />0.93 <br />$5,111 <br />1.01 <br />>1 <br />LL <br />Neutral Cost <br />2,299 <br />0 <br />8.5 <br />1.35 <br />1.15 <br />$0 <br />0.00 <br />>1 <br />X= <br />a <br />Min Cost Effectiveness <br />1,853 <br />0 <br />10.0 <br />1.61 <br />1.12 <br />1.23 <br />($1,000) <br />1.24 <br />>1 <br />'All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home. <br />2All reductions and incremental costs relative to the all -electric code compliant home. <br />3AI1 reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home except the EDR Margins are relative to the Standard Design for each case <br />which is the all -electric code compliant home. Incremental costs for these packages reflect the cots used in the On -Bill cost effectiveness methodology. Costs <br />differ for the TDV methodology due to differences in the site gas infrastructure costs (see Section 2.6). <br />4This represents the Efficiency EDR Margin for the Efficiency -Non -Preempted and Efficiency -Equipment packages and Total EDR Margin for the Efficiency & PV, <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery, Neutral Cost, and Min Cost Effectiveness packages. <br />5Positive values indicate an increase in PV capacity relative to the Standard Design. <br />110 <br />RE <br />2019-08-01 <br />415 <br />