Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 169 of 285 <br />Climate Zone 16 <br />2019 Energy Efficiency Ordinance Cost-effectiveness Study <br />Table 83: Single Family Climate Zone 16 Results Summary <br />Climate Zone 16 <br />CO2 -Equivalent <br />NPV of <br />Benefit to Cost <br />PG&E <br />Annual <br />PV Size <br />Emissions (Ibs/sf) <br />Lifetime <br />Ratio (B/C) <br />Net <br />Annual <br />EDR <br />Change <br />Incremental <br />Single Family <br />kWh <br />therms <br />Margin 4 <br />(kW <br />Total <br />Reduction <br />uc <br />Cost ($) <br />On -Bill <br />TDV <br />Code Compliant <br />(0) <br />605 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />3.31 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />_ <br />U. <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />0 <br />454 <br />5.0 <br />0.01 <br />2.59 <br />0.72 <br />$3,542 <br />1.62 <br />1.46 <br />Q <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />0 <br />474 <br />6.0 <br />(0.08) <br />2.66 <br />0.65 <br />$2,441 <br />2.19 <br />2.20 <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(18) <br />454_]. <br />10.5 <br />0.10 <br />2.36 <br />0.95 <br />$7,399 <br />0.87 <br />1.37 <br />Code Compliant <br />7,694 <br />0 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />1.73 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />Efficiency -Non -Preempted <br />5,696 <br />0 <br />9.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.38 <br />0.35 <br />$5,731 <br />1.72 <br />1.69 <br />d <br />Efficiency -Equipment <br />6,760 <br />0 <br />4.5 <br />0.00 <br />1.55 <br />0.18 <br />$2,108 <br />2.36 <br />2.32 <br />LU <br />s <br />Efficiency & PV <br />1,032 <br />0 <br />26.5 <br />2.75 <br />0.94 <br />0.79 <br />$16,582 <br />2.09 <br />1.62 <br />Q <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery <br />(11) <br />0 <br />35.0 <br />3.45 <br />0.64 <br />1.09 <br />$22,838 <br />1.71 <br />1.55 <br />o" <br />Code Compliant <br />7,694 <br />0 <br />0.0 <br />0.00 <br />I 1.73 <br />1.58 <br />($5,349) <br />0.31 <br />I 0.68 <br />0W <br />Efficiency & PV <br />1,032 <br />0 <br />26.5 <br />2.75 <br />0.94 <br />2.37 <br />$11,234 <br />1.55 <br />2.02 <br />LL <br />Ly <br />X= <br />Neutral Cost <br />5,398 <br />0 <br />8.5 <br />1.35 <br />1.51 <br />1.80 <br />$0 <br />0.00 <br />0.74 <br />a <br />Min Cost Effectiveness <br />3,358 <br />0 <br />16.0 <br />2.56 <br />1.32 <br />1.99 <br />($4,753) <br />l 1.24 <br />1.40 l <br />'All reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home. <br />2All reductions and incremental costs relative to the all -electric code compliant home. <br />3AI1 reductions and incremental costs relative to the mixed fuel code compliant home except the EDR Margins are relative to the Standard Design for each case <br />which is the all -electric code compliant home. Incremental costs for these packages reflect the cots used in the On -Bill cost effectiveness methodology. Costs <br />differ for the TDV methodology due to differences in the site gas infrastructure costs (see Section 2.6). <br />4This represents the Efficiency EDR Margin for the Efficiency -Non -Preempted and Efficiency -Equipment packages and Total EDR Margin for the Efficiency & PV, <br />Efficiency & PV/Battery, Neutral Cost, and Min Cost Effectiveness packages. <br />5Positive values indicate an increase in PV capacity relative to the Standard Design. <br />116 <br />RE <br />2019-08-01 <br />421 <br />