Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 226 of 285 2019 Nonresidential New Construction Reach Code Cost Effectiveness Study <br />Please see Appendix 6.7 for results in full detail. Generally, for mixed -fuel packages across all prototypes, <br />all climate zones were proven to have cost effective outcomes using TDV except in CZ1 with a 3 kW PV + 5 <br />kWh Battery scenario. Most climate zones also had On -Bill cost effectiveness. The addition of a battery <br />slightly reduces cost effectiveness. <br />In all -electric packages, the results for most climate zones were found cost effective using both TDV and <br />On -Bill approaches with larger PV systems or PV+Battery systems. Most 3 kW PV systems were also found <br />to be cost effective except in some scenarios analyzing the Medium Office using the On -Bill method. CZ16 <br />results continue to show challenges being cost effective with all electric buildings, likely due to the high <br />heating loads in this climate. The addition of a battery slightly reduces the cost effectiveness for all - <br />electric buildings with PV. <br />51 <br />2019-07-25 <br />478 <br />