My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 230 of 285 2019 Nonresidential New Construction Reach Code Cost Effectiveness Study <br />5 Summary, Conclusions, and Further Considerations <br />The Reach Codes Team developed packages of energy efficiency measures as well as packages combining <br />energy efficiency with PV generation and battery storage systems, simulated them in building modeling <br />software, and gathered costs to determine the cost effectiveness of multiple scenarios. The Reach Codes <br />team coordinated assumptions with multiple utilities, cities, and building community experts to develop a <br />set of assumptions considered reasonable in the current market. Changing assumptions, such as the <br />period of analysis, measure selection, cost assumptions, energy escalation rates, or utility tariffs are likely <br />to change results. <br />5.1 Summary <br />Figure 41 through Figure 43 summarize results for each prototype and depict the compliance margins <br />achieved for each climate zone and package. Because local reach codes must both exceed the Energy <br />Commission performance budget (i.e., have a positive compliance margin) and be cost-effective, the <br />Reach Code Team highlighted cells meeting these two requirements to help clarify the upper boundary <br />for potential reach code policies: <br />♦ Cells highlighted in green depict a positive compliance margin and cost-effective results using <br />both On -Bill and TDV approaches. <br />♦ Cells highlighted in yellow depict a positive compliance and cost-effective results using either the <br />On -Bill or TDV approach. <br />♦ Cells not highlighted either depict a negative compliance margin or a package that was not cost <br />effective using either the On -Bill or TDV approach. <br />For more detail on the results in the Figures, please refer to Section 4 Results. As described in Section 4.4, <br />PV -only and PV+Battery packages in the mixed -fuel building were found to be cost effective across all <br />prototypes, climate zones, and packages using the TDV approach, and results are not reiterated in the <br />following figures. <br />55 <br />2019-07-25 <br />482 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.