My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.B. - Page 63 of 70 <br />Redwood City Broadway Streetcar/Urban Circulator Study <br />Summary Report <br />■ Public/Private Partnerships - Joint Development* <br />■ Partnerships with developers of new technologies <br />(such as autonomous or connected transit vehicles)* <br />* Indicates that the funding source could be used for <br />costs of operations and maintenance. <br />The most promising funding opportunities are discussed <br />below. <br />Federal Transit Administration Funds (FTA): <br />Capital Improvement Grant (CIG) funds could cover as <br />much as 50% of the capital costs. The City would need <br />to demonstrate to the FTA that the project would meet <br />FTA thresholds for cost effectiveness, mobility, <br />environmental benefits, and congestion relief (i.e., the <br />project would need to receive a medium rating for <br />each of these categories in order to qualify for a Small <br />Starts Grant). Based upon the results of this study the <br />project should perform reasonably well in these <br />categories. <br />■ Other Federal Funds: The City will need to work with <br />the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to see if <br />there is the potential for federal formula (FTA and <br />FHWA) funds to be programmed in the future for the <br />Streetcar. Most likely any availability would beyond <br />the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) <br />period and would be in competition with other <br />regional projects that may be more defined and have <br />local matching funds identified. <br />■ State Funds: There are two examples of California <br />streetcar projects recently receiving TIRCP Grants <br />(OCTA $25.5M and Sacramento $30M). The City should <br />meet with the Caltrans Division of Rail to identify what <br />elements of the streetcar project would be eligible for <br />funding under the TIRCP program and estimate the <br />costs for these elements. <br />Local Funds: The passage of Measure W, the one-half <br />cent transportation sales tax in San Mateo County in <br />2018, provides new funding for regional transit <br />connection projects. At this time, a strategic plan is <br />being prepared to determine how these funds will be <br />assigned to projects. The City should participate in this <br />process to advocate for the eligibility of a <br />streetcar/urban circulator project in the funding <br />program. <br />Private Funding: In order to implement benefit -based <br />assessments on property owners, there will need to be <br />completed Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) and/or <br />land benefit assessment district feasibility studies to <br />identify the potential range of benefits and revenue <br />that could be generated. <br />Private Operating Funds: Property owners in the <br />Project Study Area are already spending money to <br />operate their own shuttle services. The City should <br />explore with them and the other major property <br />interests the conditions under which they would be <br />Smith <br />606 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.