My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
O5 Aare you people on crack? Will it be high speed? Ever break even in a million years? Be endlessly <br />subsidized by people who will never use it? Financed by yet another bond issue? <br />� Ridiculous use of funding <br />+t2 A I think this is a huge joke. Broadway can't handle a streetcar. The proposed route sounds great <br />but a streetcar would end up making a mess in terms of infrastructure and safety. <br />+lo A) I wouldn't use this streetcar but with Stanford and their 7,500 employees being the primary <br />beneficiary, they should paid for this in full -- Especially since they go such a sweetheart deal here in <br />RWC. <br />+9 A. If it connected the farm hill area with downtown, Id use it all the time. <br />+a A - We already have Caltrain, if Stanford and other entities want this let them foot the bill. Our tax <br />dollar would be better spent elsewhere. <br />+6 A Its seem to me we have more problems than spending a half million dollars on a study. We could <br />easily add a bus service without a study. <br />+6 A: frequent small bus/ van is MUCH better than streetcar [requiring special tracks?] - NO NEED FOR <br />MAJOR CAPITAL COMMITMENT. <br />+5 A - Pointless <br />We already have rails/tracks that run from RWC out to Facebook! Rejuvenate that line and let's roll! <br />+5 A <br />Is this the City's answer to our traffic gridlock on EI Camino, Whipple and Woodside? There is no room <br />on the proposed streetcar lines for a Street Car. Where are the streetcar riders to park? Another lame <br />idea. Why doesn't the Council visit Cities that actually have functional public transportation. <br />+5 A! Get a clue no more construction ! We have already gone way too far! <br />+4 A -it wouldn't be anywhere near my house ... I would love to use it if it had a stop somewhere up <br />woodside by alameda de las Pulgas <br />+4 A. What is wrong with taking buses or the train ??? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.