My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-02-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-02-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 11:31:49 AM
Creation date
2/7/2020 2:47:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/10/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A - Page 15 of 23 <br />21 Elements <br />developing in an area required to remain as `Natural State'; if a property has maxed out the "developable <br />area "? <br />Areas where ADUs are allowed can only be limited due to public safety, traffic flow, or the <br />availability of water and sewer. If slope is so steep that it present a threat to public safety, <br />ADUs can be prohibited. Jurisdictions may limit building in environmentally sensitive areas <br />but somewhere on the lot, the person has to be able to build a special (e) ADU. ADUs must <br />also conform with any Local Coastal Plan, wetland laws, etc. <br />• Can a local jurisdiction prohibit an AD U from being accessed from a secondary driveway, requiring an <br />ADU to be accessedfrom theprimary driveway? Many jurisdictions may not run into access issues, but on <br />very large properties Fire Departments will usually require some type of emergency vehicle access, which could <br />deny an ADU if they cannotprovide access off the primary driveway. <br />Generally, cities are free to additional standards as long as they do not prevent the <br />development of special (e) ADUs. <br />8. Lot Size and FAR <br />• Can a local jurisdiction require a minimum lot side for detached AD Us, while still allowing attached <br />ADUs on any lot si.Ze; <br />Lot size cannot be a criteria. <br />• If a site is already maxed out on floor area, does the jurisdiction still have to allow an ADU? <br />Regardless of FAR, any homeowner can build a special (e) ADU. <br />• Ifyes, would we apply this `free" SF to all lots, or only those that are maxed out on floor area? Meaning is <br />someone already had an ADU, they would notget the `free" SF to add somewhere else, giving maxed out <br />properties a distinct advantage to develop additional SF. <br />That is a policy decision. It's true that some property owners will get more FAR than others, <br />but some jurisdictions might be ok with this. <br />• If a jurisdiction allows 2 ADUs on many properties, , would theyget the `free" SF for a 2nd ADU since the <br />jurisdiction allows 2 AD Us someone already has one AD U and are maxed out on floor area? <br />Single family homeowners are only entitled to trump local standards for the first ADU, and <br />only for an ADU up to 800 square feet, no more than 16 feet high, with 4 -foot side and rear <br />setbacks. <br />9. Maximum size <br />• Can a height limitation of less than 76 ft be imposed on ADUs? <br />For ADUs over 800 sf, you could have lower height limits. For existing buildings being <br />converted or 800 or less sf new buildings, -you must allow 16 feet. HCD reports that they <br />believe the minimum height should be 16 feet. <br />• W>hat is the absolute maximum size an ADU may be for attached and detached ADUs? <br />Although state ADU law provides that the maximum ADU size is 1200 sf for a detached <br />ADU and 50% of the main house for an attached ADU, agencies are also allowed to be <br />more permissive rules than the state law specifies. <br />10. jADUs <br />• Whatis the definition of jAD U? <br />4 <br />363 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.