Laserfiche WebLink
questionable community benefit are not necessary activities. <br />Regarding ongoing procedural issues: <br />1.) It is unclear to me from the staff report if the city's emergency authority to restrict travel on <br />streets ceases when emergency conditions cease. If restricted, does unrestricted travel resume <br />when "shelter in place" conditions conclude? <br />2.) Does a council action "to implement" in this case, mean to implement additional study of <br />the proposed or to actually implement street closures. And, if the action is to implement the <br />study, is staff required to bring the issue back before Council? <br />3.) The staff report claims that there has been community outreach regarding proposed. I find, <br />again, that outreach insufficient. Did staff notify the neighborhood associations about the <br />proposed? Did the neighborhood associations solicit input from area residents? Did the <br />Transportation Advisory Committee have sufficient resources to adequately determine and <br />represent the community interests they are impanelled to represent? <br />Emergency conditions should not be viewed as an opportunity to act without due <br />consideration of all foreseeable consequences. <br />Thank you. <br />Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A <br />