My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-02-11 Clsd and Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-02-11 Clsd and Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2008 4:45:43 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 4:05:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
2/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />'Governor' Continued from Page 1.., <br /> <br />league President and San Diego City Council Member Jim Madaffer. Second Vice President and <br />Rolling Hills Estates Council Member Judy Mitchell and Immediate Past President and Riverside <br />Mayor Ron Loveridge represented the League, The Governor called the meeting to brief local <br />government leaders on California's serious budget deficit and his plan to continue to move the <br />state forward while addressing the looming shortfall. <br /> <br />Included in the Governor's agenda are programs he wants to accelerate because of the direct <br />impact they can have on the economy, Specifically, he intends to issue the remaining 2006 <br />infrastructure bonds approved by voters, which amounts to about $29 billion. Some of these <br />funds will finance critical state and local transportation projects. The Governor also told local <br />government leaders that he is committed to pushing for a healthcare package in the legislature, <br /> <br />Along with outlining his proposal to place restrictions on expenditures during economically robust <br />times, the Governor asked for input from local governments on potential budget solutions and <br />was interested in the reaction of local government officials to his proposed budget. <br /> <br />The leaders in the room expressed concern over a number of the local government proposals in <br />his budget, but were also quick to recognize the magnitude of the problem faced by the Governor <br />and legislature in closing an estimated $14 biUion defICit. <br /> <br />The local officials in attendance were supportive of the Governor's efforts to put the state's bond <br />money to work on infrastructure needs in California. League President Jim Madaffer assured the <br />Governor that cities were ready to put the bond money to good use, in particular, the <br />transportation money passed by the voters in Proposition 1A (2006). <br /> <br />The meeting rounded out with a discussion of how the Governor hopes to deal with the state's <br />projected cash flow problems over the next 12 to 18 months. As part of his strategy, he proposed <br />delaying payments on the Highway Users Tax (per gallon gasoline excise tax) to local <br />governments for five months. <br /> <br />The League's leadership was concerned that this delay could postpone local projects, These <br />projects are important to the communities and the overall economy. The Governor's staff said <br />that they were not wedded to any particular program on the list of proposed budget delays, but <br />also reiterated the serious nature of the cash flow problem and how it could only be managed <br />with an array of solutions, <br /> <br />As the meeting concluded. the Governor encouraged local officials to continue the dialogue with <br />the Administration throughout the budget process. The League will continue to monitor the <br />budget and will issue updates through Priority Focus and the Web site ~cacitie$,orq). The <br />league's analysis of the Governor's proposed FY 2008-09 budget is available online at <br />www.caclties.orQ. <br /> <br />'Homeowners Protection Act Qualifies' Continued from Pago 1." <br /> <br />If passed by voters. the Homeowners Protection Act would provide solid protections for <br />homeowners by prohibiting governments from taking an owner-occupied home to transfer to a <br />private party. The measure is a direct response to the U.S, Supreme Court's infamous Kelo v. <br />City of New London decision of 2005. <br /> <br />The broad coalition supporting the Homeowners Protection Act includes seniors, homeowners, <br />business, labor, environmentalists, affordable housing advocates, public safety leaders and local <br />government. <br /> <br />Last week the so..called California Property Owners and Fannland Protection Act qualified for the <br />June ballot. This anti-rent control measure would also eviscerate local land use planning, gut <br />environmental protections and undennine public water projects needed to ensure the state an <br />adequate supply of clean drinking water. The deeply flawed measure, also known as the "Hidden <br />Agendas Scheme," is being funded by wealthy apartment owners and mobile home park owners. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.