My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-02-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-02-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2011 8:41:45 AM
Creation date
2/21/2008 3:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
2/25/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page �age 52 <br /> The choices the city faces are to ask the voters to change the wording of the tax ordinance so that the <br /> city can continue to collect the current tax on phone bills or to do nothing and let the telephone part of <br /> the tax go away and cut city capital projects by two million dollars a year. Which idea do you think is <br /> better, to reword the law and continue collecting the tax on telephone bills or do nothing and cut the <br /> ciry"s capital budget by two million dollars a year? <br /> % n <br /> Reword and continue collecting .........................................................61.29 ............. 245 <br /> Do nothing and cut $2 million .............................................................22.53 ............... 90 <br /> Don't know/not sure ............................................................................16.18 ............... 65 <br /> 19. Another idea is to ensure that the tax applies to all phone calls. Currently the tax applies to calls <br /> within California but not interstate calls or calls to other countries. And calls made over the internet, <br /> cable, DSL or private T-One lines are not subject to the ciry tax. Would it be a good idea or a bad idea <br /> to apply the tax to all calls, no matter where they go and no matter what technology is used to place <br /> them? The tax on internet calls would not become effective unless the federal law prohibiting taxes on <br /> the internet is changed. <br /> % n <br /> Goodidea ............................................................................................39.63 .............159 <br /> Badidea ...............................................................................................50.02.............200 <br /> Don't know/not sure ............................................................................10.36 ............... 41 <br /> 20. Still another idea is to reword the city law and tax all calls but also reduce the rate of the tax on <br /> telephone bills from the current five percent to four percent. This would mean the tax on a$100 <br /> telephone bill would be $4.00 instead of $5.00. If this were done, the ciry would receive $500,000 less <br /> per year than it does now. If the city decides to ask voters to approve a change in the wording of the <br /> tax, should it keep the tax on telephone bills at five percent or should it reduce the tax on telephone <br /> bills to four percent? <br /> % n <br /> Keep the telephone tax at 5% ............................................................40.97.............164 <br /> Reduce the telephone tax to 4% ........................................................45.89 .............184 <br /> Don't know/not sure ............................................................................13.15 ............... 53 <br /> 21. If the tax on telephone calls were broadened to include all calls, interstate and in state and regardless <br /> of the technology involved, that would raise enough money to cover the city's loss of funds from <br /> reducing the tax rate from five to four percent. Therefore, the City could both broaden the tax and <br /> reduce the rate and taxpayers as a whole would not end up paying any more or any less than they do <br /> now. Do you think this is a good idea or a bad idea? <br /> % n <br /> Good idea ............................................................................................48.60 .............194 <br /> Badidea ...............................................................................................35.92.............144 <br /> Don't know/not sure ............................................................................15.48 ............... 62 <br /> Now I am going to read some things people are saying about the utility tax. For each one, please tell <br /> me whether you agree or disagree with it. (PRESS FOR STRONGLY OR ONLY SOMEWHAT.) <br /> (ROTATE) <br /> Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Not <br /> Stron4lv Somewhat Somewhat Stronplv Sure <br /> 22. The utility users tax is a fairly harmless way <br /> for the ciry to raise money for capital <br /> improvements. Keep the tax rate at five <br /> percent for all utilities .........................................36.85........ 28.99 ............16.40..........14.61........3.15 <br /> 147 ........... 116 .................66 ............... 58...........13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.