Laserfiche WebLink
<br />encouraging revitalizatIon/remodeling in "character" with surrounding neighborhood <br />character, improving the streeVpedestrian access, etc. <br />. Improving the quality and quantity of housing for many family types and economic <br />segments <br />. Strengthening and improving access to and the quality of open space and recreation <br />areas including but not limited to the Bayfront, Stulsaft and Red Morton parks, and local <br />creeks <br />. Exploring land use options fora possible ferry terminal/landing <br />. Coordinating with the Grand Boulevard Initiative <br />. Improving the sustainability and livability of Redwood City <br /> <br />Subtask 7.2.2 Circulation <br /> <br />Traffic Report <br />Once the city-wide traffic model has been calibrated for the base year, Fehr & Peers will develop <br />future traffic forecasts that will incorporate appropriate assumptions for trip generation and trip <br />distribution. (The modeling work is being conducted as part ofaseparate work effort). We will <br />work with the City to ensure that future programmed transportation improvements are correctly <br />added to the model network. We will rely on the City and other members of the consultant team <br />to develop socioeconomic projections ina format consistent with the model's geographic zone <br />system for the future year scenarios. <br /> <br />Traffic forecasts will be produced for the Future No Project scenario, which represents buildout of <br />the existing General Plan. In addition, forecasts will be prepared for up to three New General <br />Plan buildoutalternatives. For each of the alternatives, Fehr & Peers will generally identify the <br />transportation infrastructure necessary to address deficiencies identified through the modeling. <br />The results will be used to determine the effectiveness of potential circulation improvements and <br />their possible inclusion in the final Preferred Alternative. In addition, Citywide transportation <br />measures such as vehicle miles of travel, hours of delay, and numbers of trips generated will be <br />calculated for each of the three alternatives and will be used to assist in comparing and <br />contrasting the effects of the alternatives. This analysis will also identify any "Recommended <br />Circulation Improvements" that are revealed by the 2030 General Plan Analysis, even if the <br />improvements are not necessary to mitigate potentially significant impacts. <br /> <br />The Preferred Alternative will contain the final land use and circulation system improvements; <br />such that the results meet the level of service criteria and other relevant policies set by the City or <br />are deemed undesirable because of secondary impacts. The transportation network identified to <br />support the final Preferred Alternative will be represented in the Circulation Diagram in the <br />General Plan. <br /> <br />Fehr & Peers will develop future daily, AM and PM peak hour traffic forecasts at up to 50 roadway <br />segments and 22 freeway segments in the Redwood City General Plan study area for the final <br />Preferred Alternative. These forecasts will be adjusted to account for model error before being <br />used in subsequent operations analysis. Roadway level of service analysis will be conducted for <br />these segments, using LOS volume thresholds developed in' consultation with City staff. This <br />roadway segment LOS analysis will form a key part of the transportation chapter of the EIR <br />(described in Task 5 below). Please note that this scope does not anticipate doing <br />comprehensive roadway LOS analysis for the other three General Plan alternatives; we <br />recommend consultation with staff and other members of the consultant team to decide whether <br />the environmental documentation of the General Plan should include this greater level of detail, <br />and if so, an amended scope and budget will be prepared. <br /> <br />SCOPE OF SERVICES <br />Redwood City General Plan <br />January 11,2008 <br />Page 23 <br />