Laserfiche WebLink
Subject: Resolution <br />Giselle <br />I did not initially check your Facebook posting referenced by a Daily Post reporter on July <br />30. That was my error. I did check it this weekend. It reads, "I just submitted a referral <br />asking Council to adopt a resolution in support of Black Lives Matters and to commission a <br />mural or monument that visually affirms our support." That sounds a lot like you are <br />proposing a new Black Lives Matter mural. <br />I emailed you on August 3 about the mural comments attributed to you by the Post, and you <br />responded to me on August 4, saying, "To clarify, in the post I made covered by the press you read <br />I did not call for a Black Lives Matters mural... " Your August 4 response does not square with <br />the Post's article about your Facebook posting. So, I followed up with another email on <br />August 4 suggesting that you contact the Daily Post to clear up any misunderstanding about <br />the Facebook posting. No response. It's curious that a Council agenda item was publicly <br />posted 2-3 days after I suggested contacting the Post. That agenda item says, "Redwood <br />City Council... Black Lives Matter: The council will consider passing a resolution in <br />support of Black Lives Matter and commissioning a mural or monument in support of racial <br />equity." Tomorrow night's agenda item seems to validate the Post's July 30 claim that <br />"Hale seeks new mural." <br />I am not on the Council and I do not have a vote on the agenda item noted above, but I stand <br />by my comments made to you in my initial email on this subject. It read, in part, "I feel <br />there is an opportunity here to show real leadership with respect to expressing support for <br />justice everywhere, and our community can seize that opportunity in a positive way. As a <br />result, I would propose an alternative public display. Something longer lasting than a <br />mural. Perhaps a monument or sculpture placed downtown or in one of our many parks that <br />captures the essence of the continuing struggle for justice." I feel such a public display <br />should focus on a powerful message and not a movement. <br />I consider myself very fortunate to have met Dr. Terrence Roberts, one of the Little Rock <br />Nine, and a few years later, Leon "Woodie" Spears, a Tuskegee airman. When speaking <br />with them, what struck me was their incredible courage in confronting racism. Even though <br />both men were humble and gracious, the message that we must insist on racial equity could <br />not have been more clear. With that being said, how about renaming the Courthouse <br />Square? Maybe call it the "John Lewis Freedom Plaza." Conceptually, perhaps a series of <br />statutes or plaques or both representing the struggle for justice. Call it the "John Lewis <br />Freedom Walk." In my opinion, the display should capture the struggle for justice by all <br />marginalized and disenfranchised peoples. <br />Here are some possibilities for a Freedom Walk... <br />Sojourner Truth: Ardent abolitionist and equal rights advocate; first black woman to <br />successfully sue a white man in court <br />Frederick Douglass: Tireless opponent of racial injustice and great supporter of women's <br />rights; reconciled with the man who once owned him; said "Without a struggle, there can be <br />no progress" <br />Chief Joseph: Nez Perce peacemaker; resisted relocation and eventually led his tribe back to <br />the Pacific Northwest; said, "Treat all men alike. Give them the same law. Give them an <br />