My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt20 Redwood City Improvement Association-CBID Operating Agreement
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
Agmt20 Redwood City Improvement Association-CBID Operating Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2023 4:02:59 PM
Creation date
8/12/2020 12:38:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Redwood City Improvement Association
PROJECT NAME
Management and Disbursement Agreement
RMP File Number
304
Date
7/28/2020
Reso Ref
Ordinance 2411
MO Ref
See Ord 2411
Amendment
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CBID are for services, programs and improvements directly benefiting each individual parcel <br />within this area and support increased cleanliness, commerce, business attraction and <br />retention, increased property rental income and improved District identity. No CBID funded <br />services, activities or programs will be provided beyond the CBID boundaries. <br />While every attempt is made to provide CBID services and programs to confer benefits only to <br />those identified assessed parcels within the CBID, the California State Constitution was <br />amended via Proposition 218 to stipulate that general benefits exist, either by design or <br />unintentional, in all assessment districts and that a portion of the program costs must be <br />considered attributable to general benefits and assigned a value. General benefits cannot be <br />funded by assessment revenues. General benefits might be conferred on parcels within the <br />District, or "spillover" onto parcels surrounding the District, or to the public at large who might <br />be passing through the District with no intention of transacting business within the District or <br />interest in the District itself. <br />Conventional assessment engineering experience has found that general benefits within a given <br />district tend to range from 2-5% of the total costs. There are three methods that have been <br />used by the Assessment Engineer for determining general and special benefit ratios within <br />assessment districts: <br />(1) The parcel by parcel allocation method <br />(2) The program/activity line item allocation method, and <br />(3) The composite district overlay determinant method. <br />A majority of CBIDs or PBIDs in California for which the Assessment Engineer has provided <br />assessment engineering services since the enactment of Proposition 218, have used Method #3, <br />the composite district overlay determinant method which will be used for the Downtown <br />Redwood City District CBID. This method of computing the value of general benefit involves a <br />composite of two distinct types of general benefit — benefit to the public at large within the <br />District and benefit to parcels outside the District. <br />Separate General Benefits from Special Benefits and Related Costs (Prop 218): <br />Total costs are estimated at $ 781,035 (see Table below). General benefits are factored at 3% of <br />total (see Finding 2 on page 6 of the Assessment Engineer's report) with special benefits set at <br />97%. Prop 218 limits the levy of property assessments to costs attributed to special benefits <br />only. The 3% general benefit cost is computed to be $ 24,612 with a resultant 97% special <br />benefit limit computed at $ 795,781. This is the maximum amount of revenue that can be <br />derived from property assessments from the subject CBID. The total amount of revenue <br />proposed to be derived from CBID assessments and general benefits for Year 1 is $ 820,393.00. <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.