Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 4 of 15 <br />customers in the surrounding area. This tax capture would continue for the foreseeable future but would <br />likely decline at some point as other jurisdictions allow cannabis retailers over time. <br />Based on the feedback that staff has received by the community and a few of the current cannabis delivery <br />operators, staff believes that allowing cannabis retail storefront businesses in the City would complement <br />other retail activity and drive additional pedestrian traffic to those retailers. In addition, it would also <br />complement the current cannabis delivery services that are licensed with the City. <br />Question 1: Should the City permit up to six cannabis retail storefront businesses? <br />The City Council will need to determine how many cannabis storefront retailers will be allowed to locate <br />in the City. There are currently six non -storefront cannabis delivery operations permitted in Redwood City. <br />In addition, out-of-town retailers operate in the City and are subject to Redwood City's cannabis tax. <br />Non -storefront cannabis delivery businesses that are located in the City are permitted to locate in the <br />Industrial Restricted, Light Industrial Incubator, Industrial Park, General Industrial, and Commercial Office <br />zoning districts and must be 600 feet from schools, day care centers and recreation centers. The owners <br />of these non -storefront businesses may be interested in obtaining licenses for retail storefront operations. <br />However, staff believes that none of the currently licensed non -storefront delivery services are in <br />locations that would allow them to expand into storefront retail operations. This is because they are <br />smaller in located outside of the retail areas of the city. Thus, storefront retailers would likely be in <br />different locations than non -storefront retailers, even if in some cases they have the same owners. <br />Cannabis retail businesses typically serve the local community, rather than a statewide market. <br />Consequently, the number of retailers is somewhat proportional to the local population. Consumer <br />demand for cannabis is assumed to be constant, regardless of the legality of the business operation or the <br />number of retailers. It is reasonable to conclude that more retailers would mean fewer customers for each <br />business and lower gross receipts. The tax revenue generated by cannabis retailers is generally a function <br />of the size of the market rather than the number of retailers. <br />Providing greater access to retailers could initially result in a shift in cannabis purchases occurring through <br />legal, regulated channels rather than through the illicit market. Eventually though, the local cannabis <br />market will reach saturation, at which point new cannabis retailers will simply cannibalize sales from <br />existing retailers. Essentially, both licensed and unlicensed cannabis retailers all share the same market. <br />In places where no legal access is provided, it can be assumed that the unlicensed market will essentially <br />dominate the market. Where licensed retailers are available, convenient, and competitive, it is likely that <br />sales will steadily shift from the illicit market over time. However, the taxable amount of gross sales will <br />likely plateau at some point regardless of the number of retailers. <br />According to data collected by Marijuana Business Daily, during the early stages of COVID-19, delivery services <br />saw an unprecedented increase in customers, in some cases as high as 220%, but recently data shows that <br />customers are returning to storefront retail stores. The reason for this shift is the benefit a cannabis retail <br />establishment provides the consumer, which is the interaction with a salesperson who is knowledgeable <br />about the products. <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />157 <br />