Laserfiche WebLink
9.A. - Page 33 of 34 <br />clarity to property owners and to limit staff time required to review plans for compliance. Staff considered, <br />but does not recommend, only an infeasibility exception instead of the specified exceptions as this <br />approach would likely increase the situations requiring staff review and therefore increase workload <br />without any offsetting resources. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />This activity is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as defined in CEQA <br />Guidelines, section 15378, because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably <br />foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with the agenda items being listed, at least 72 <br />hours prior to the meeting. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Adopt All -Electric Reach Codes with no exceptions. <br />2. Adopt All -Electric Reach Codes including certain exceptions as directed by Council. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Attachment A — Draft ordinance <br />Attachment B — Statewide Reach Code Residential Cost Effectiveness Study <br />Attachment C — Statewide Reach Code Nonresidential Cost Effectiveness Study <br />Attachment D — PG&E Letter <br />REPORT PREPARED BY: <br />Christina McTaggart, Chief Building Official <br />cmctaggart@redwoodcity.org <br />(650) 780-7228 <br />Christopher Dacumos, Management Analyst II <br />cdacumos@redwoodcity.org <br />(650) 780-5957 <br />Radha Mehta, Management Fellow <br />rmehta@redwoodcity.org <br />(650) 780-7231 <br />Page 13 of 14 <br />W <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />135 <br />